Search results for "Vinorelbine"

Oral vinorelbine and capecitabine as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis

2021

A retrospective analysis of 70 patients with triple-negative or hormone-resistant advanced breast carcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy was carried out. Patients received oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Overall response rate was 53% with a 9% complete response rate. Stable disease was recorded in 27% of the cases. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and median overall survival was 29.2 months. Toxicity was generally mild and easily manageable. These data demonstrate that this combination is feasible, safe and active as first-line treatment of triple-negative fully hormone-resistant…

Oral vinorelbine may not induce acute pain at the tumor site.

2006

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and…

2003

Abstract Purpose: we carried out a phase III randomized trial to compare vinorelbine–cisplatin regimen to gemcitabine–cisplatin regimen, and to a sequential administration of gemcitabine–ifosfamide followed by vinorelbine–cisplatin or the opposite sequence of vinorelbine–cisplatin followed by ifosfamide–gemcitabine according to the ‘worst drug rule’ hypothesis in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was survival parameters, while secondary endpoints included analysis of response rates and toxicity. Patients and methods: patients were randomized to receive: (a) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15…

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicentre phase II clinical trial

2001

Abstract A phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was carried out to evaluate the clinical activity and toxicity of the chemotherapeutic combination of gemcitabine+vinorelbine (GEM/VNR). Forty-five patients (40 male, 5 female) with a median age of 67 years (range 37–73) and a median ECOG performance status of 1 (range 0–2) were enrolled into the trial. Twenty patients had stage IIIB (two positive supraclavicular nodes and 20 cytologically positive pleural effusion), and 25 had stage IV NSCLC. GEM 1000 mg/m 2 diluted in 250 cc 3 of normal saline was administered iv on days 1, 8, and 15, while VNR was given 30 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. The…

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin plus vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized s…

2002

Abstract Purpose: To compare a regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin (VC) to the combination of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) in patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main endpoits were analysis of objective response rates, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Patients and methods: 247 eligible patients were randomized to receive (a) vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 intravenous bolus on days 1and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks, or (b) mitomycin c 8 mg/m 2 i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m 2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, plus cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. In subsequent cycles vindesine was given every oth…

Weekly docetaxel vs. docetaxel-based combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

2009

Abstract Background Doublet chemotherapy is more effective than single-agent as first line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No reliable information instead is available on the effect of doublets in second line treatment. The aim of DISTAL-2 study was to compare two doublets containing docetaxel with single agent docetaxel as second line treatment of patients with NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov id.:. NCT00345059 ). Methods NSCLC patients, aged 2 on days 1, 8, 15 q 4 weeks); arm B, weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15) plus gemcitabine (800 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8 q 4 weeks) or plus vinorelbine (20 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8 q 4 weeks) depending on which of the two had been u…

Cisplatin plus weekly vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized …

2008

Summary Purpose A phase III randomized trial was carried out to compare two schedules of the vinorelbine (VNR)–cisplatin (CDDP) regimen in patients with locally advanced unresectable poor prognosis stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and analysis of toxicity, while secondary endpoints included response rates, time-to-progression (TTP) and quality of life (QoL). Patients and methods Eligible patients were randomized to receive: (a) VNR 25 mg/m 2 on day 1, 8 and 15 plus CDDP 100 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 4 weeks or (b) VNR 30 mg/m 2 on day 1 and 8 plus CDDP 80 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. All patients were chemotherapy-n…

Oral vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and implications for patient management.

2007

Vinorelbine is an established treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both as a single agent and in combination chemotherapy. Recently, an oral form of this agent has been developed. Before accepting an established agent in a different administration form, rigorous testing is required to answer such questions as reliable bioavailability, continued safety and preservation of efficacy. In addition, an oral agent must provide patient convenience and acceptance, while being an economically sound approach. Oral vinorelbine was found to have acceptable and reliable pharmacokinetic profiles at clinically relevant dosage levels. Oral vinorelbine was found to have approximately 40…

Oral capecitabine and Vinorelbine in Metastatic Breast Cancer. A Retrospective Analysis of Tolerability and Activity

2012

ABSTRACT Background The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze toxicity profile and activity of an all-oral combination schedule of Capecitabine (Cape) and Vinorelbine (VNR) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Methods All pts treated had a histological confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). Each 3-week cycle of treatment consisted of 500 mg/m2 cape twice daily (2 weeks on, 1 week off), and 60 mg/m2 VNR on days 1 and 8. Results From June'07 to December'11 we analyzed 77 MBC pts. Median age was 52 years (range 34-73). 58 pts (75,3%) had a performance status (PS) ECOG 0; 13 pts (16,8%) PS1, 6 pts (7,8%) PS2. 5 pts (6,5%) had metastatic disease at time of diagnos…