Search results for "exceptions"

showing 7 items of 17 documents

Déclaration et vérification des créances. Collectivité publique créancière. Défaut de déclaration. Extinction de la créance. Marchés de travaux publi…

2001

International audience; (CE, 7e et 5e sous-sect., 14 juin 2000, Banque Rhône-Alpes, D.2001.2117, note P. Ancel)

Extinction de la créance[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawRedressement et liquidation judiciaires[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawCAUTIONNEMENTDéclaration des créancesOpposabilité des exceptions
researchProduct

Cautionnement. La caution ne pouvant opposer au créancier les exceptions purement personnelles au débiteur principal, elle n'est pas recevable à invo…

2007

International audience; (Cass., ch. mixte, 8 juin 2007, pourvoi n° 03-15.602, arrêt n° 254 P+B+R+I, Velluz c/ Magrino, D. 2007. AJ. 1782, obs. V. Avena-Robardet, et Jur. 2201, note D. Houtcieff)

Nullité relative[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Law[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawException purement personnelle au débiteurCAUTIONNEMENTDolOpposabilité des exceptions
researchProduct

Il principio del non refoulement tra controllo dell'accesso al territorio dell'Unione europea e protezione dei diritti umani

2020

Nonostante il non-refoulement sia un principio cardine del diritto internazionale dei rifugiati, il suo preciso ambito di applicazione e l’esatta individuazione degli obblighi a carico degli Stati sono oggetto di incertezza per la tensione costante tra due opposte tendenze. In quanto espressione di un valore umanitario fondamentale, sono fiorite interpretazioni estensive, ma, in quanto limite al potere sovrano dello Stato di regolare l’accesso al territorio, sono emerse tendenze di segno restrittivo. L’articolo presenta la politica comune di asilo come sottoposta alla stessa tensione e ne descrive per grandi linee gli aspetti che costituiscono un ampliamento della protezione offerta dal dir…

Politica comune dell’Unione europea in materia di asilo – mezzi di ricorso effettivi – ambito di applicazione soggettivo del principio di non-refoulement – ambito di applicazione nello spazio del principio di non-refoulement – eccezioni al principio di non-refoulementSettore IUS/14 - Diritto Dell'Unione EuropeaEU Common Policy on Asylum Effective Remedies Personal and Territorial Scope of Application of the Non-refoulement Principle Exceptions to the Non-refoulement PrincipleSettore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
researchProduct

Caution. Le droit d'un crédit-bailleur de revendiquer les biens loués dans la procédure collective du crédit-preneur constitue un droit préférentiel …

2012

International audience; (Com., 15 juin 2011, n° 10-13.537, arrêt n° 615 F-D, Soguafi c/ Bibrac, RJDA 8-9/2011, n° 734)

Procédure collectiveDélai[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/LawRevendication[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/LawSAUVEGARDE DES ENTREPRISESSauvegardeCAUTIONNEMENTRevendication hors délaiCrédit-bailOpposabilité des exceptions
researchProduct

Ragionamento giuridico. Particolarismo. In difesa di un approccio psicologistico

2017

Legal Reasoning, Particularism: In Defense of a Psychologistic Approach. In this paper I recommend a close examination of the reasons favouring a deep and potentially far reaching reorientation of legal theory, and of the theory of norms and norm-based reasoning and decision-making generally, namely, the adoption of a psychologistic approach (“psychodeontics”). I argue in favour of psychologism - not in the anstract, but - with reference to rwo particular topics: legal reasoning (specifically, the justification of judicial decisions) and the project of a of two-tier (principles v. rules) theory of law, informed by a particularistic conception of practical reasoning. I show that there are as…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoLegal reasoning Normativity Psychologism Particularism Exceptions
researchProduct

Reasons, Rules, Exceptions. Towards a Psychological Account

2018

In this paper we defend a psychological account of rule-based reasoning, specifically of the relationship between rules and exceptions. The topic of our inquiry are the relations between rules, the reasons underlying them, and exceptions. In analysing these relations, first, we outline an apparent paradox, the “paradox of rules”, and a related problem, the “problem of reconsideration”. Then, we propose a solution to, or better dissolution of, the paradox, grounded in an account of the psychological processes underlying rule-application and reconsideration. We claim, that is, that the problem of reconsideration should be answered by appealing to matters of sheer psychological fact. The upsho…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRules. Exceptions. Particularism. Psychologism. Rule-based reasoning.Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
researchProduct

Introduction to "Human Rights & Security: Justifying Exceptions"

2017

Since its introduction in the 1990s1, the concept of securitization has received widespread attention well beyond the field of international relations in the context of which it first appeared. The concept indicates the discursive process in which: (i) an agent claims (securitization move) the necessity to adopt exceptional measures which bring about serious violations of otherwise binding rules, in order to protect a certain value from a grave and extraordinary threat, with the scope of convincing a specific audience to accept those measures and the violations to follow; (ii) the move is successful and the audience effectively accepts the exceptional measures (securitization). One of the p…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Dirittosecuritizationhuman securityhuman rightSettore SPS/01 - Filosofia Politicastate of exceptionssecuritySettore SPS/06 - Storia Delle Relazioni InternazionaliSettore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
researchProduct