Search results for "jel:L13"

showing 10 items of 18 documents

Multiproduct trading with a common agent under complete information: Existence and characterization of Nash equilibrium

2014

This paper focuses on oligopolistic markets in which indivisible goods are sold by multiproduct firms to a continuum of homogeneous buyers, with measure normalized to one, who have preferences over bundles of products. Our analysis contributes to the literature on private, delegated agency games with complete information, extending the insights by Chiesa and Denicolò (2009) to multiproduct markets with indivisibilities and where the agent's preferences need not be monotone. By analyzing a kind of extended contract schedules -mixed bundling prices- that discriminate on exclusivity, the paper shows that efficient equilibria always exist in such settings. There may also exist inefficient equil…

Economics and EconometricsSequential equilibriumjel:D4105 social sciencesjel:C72Trembling hand perfect equilibriumSymmetric equilibrium050301 educationjel:D21jel:D43Multiproduct Price Competition Delegated Agency Games Mixed Bundling Prices Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium Strong EquilibriumSubgame perfect equilibriumMicroeconomicssymbols.namesakeSubgameNash equilibriumEquilibrium selection0502 economics and businessjel:L13symbolsEconomicsEpsilon-equilibrium0503 educationMathematical economics050205 econometrics
researchProduct

Multi-product firms and product variety

2008

The goal of this paper is to study the role of multi-product firms in the market provision of product variety. The analysis is conducted using the spokes model of non-localized competition proposed by Chen and Riordan (2007). Firstly, we show that multi-product firms are at a competitive disadvantage vis-a-vis single-product firms and can only emerge if economies of scope are sufficiently strong. Secondly, under duopoly product variety may be higher or lower with respect to both the first best and the monopolistically competitive equilibrium. However, within a relevant range of parameter values duopolists drastically restrict their product range in order to relax price competition, and as a…

Economics and Econometricsjel:D43product variety multiproduct firms monopolistic competition spatial modelsCompetitive equilibriumVariety (cybernetics)MicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)Monopolistic competitionjel:L12product variety multiproduct firms monopolisticOrder (exchange)Economies of scopejel:L13EconomicsProduct (category theory)DuopolyIndustrial organization
researchProduct

Quality pricing-to-market

2014

We examine firm's pricing-to-market decisions in vertically differentiated industries featuring a large number of firms that compete monopolistically in the quality space. Firms sell goods of heterogeneous quality to consumers with non-homothetic preferences that differ in their income and thus their marginal willingness to pay for quality increments. We derive closed-form solutions for the pricing game under costly international trade, thus establishing existence and uniqueness. We then examine how the interaction of good quality and market demand for quality affects firms' pricing-to-market decisions. The relative price of high quality goods compared to that of low quality goods is an inc…

Economics and Econometricsmedia_common.quotation_subjectjel:E41Product differentiationProduct differentiationMonopolistic competitionExchange rateExchange rate pass-through0502 economics and businessEconomicsPrice levels ; International tradejel:E3Pricing-to-marketQuality (business)Market power050207 economicsIndustrial organization050205 econometrics media_commonbiology05 social sciencesExchange-rate pass-throughCompetitor analysisbiology.organism_classification[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceMussaQualityjel:F12jel:L13jel:F4exchange rate pass-through; intra-industry trade; monopolistic competition; pricing-to-market; vertical differentiationFinance
researchProduct

ENDOGENOUS TIMING WITH FREE ENTRY

2006

A free entry model with linear costs is considered where firms first choose their entry time and then compete in the market according to the resulting timing decisions. Multiple equilibria arise allowing for infinitely many industry output configurations encompassing one limit-output dominant firm and the Cournot equilibrium with free entry as extreme cases. Sequential entry is never observed. Both Stackelberg and Cournot-like outcomes are sustainable as equilibria however. When the number of incumbents is given, entry is always prevented, and industry output is sometimes larger than the entry preventing level.

Entry preventionEntry timeCournot competitionSettore SECS-P/06 - Economia ApplicataMarket leadershipjel:L11Microeconomicsfree entry market leadership entry preventionFree entryjel:L13EconomicsStackelberg competitionmedicineFree entrymedicine.symptomEndogenous Timing Entry PreemptionIndustrial organization
researchProduct

Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking

2009

Abstract Studies of banking competition and competitive behavior both within and across countries typically utilise only one of the few measures that are available. In trying to assess the relative competitive position of banking markets in 14 European countries, existing indicators of competition are found to give conflicting predictions across countries, within countries, and over time. This is because indicators of competition tend to measure different things and are additionally influenced by cross-country differences in cost efficiency, fee income levels, real economic growth and inflation. We attempt to separate bank pricing power from these embodied influences and derive more consist…

InflationEconomics and EconometricsCost efficiencybusiness.industrymedia_common.quotation_subjectInternational economicsMonetary economicsjel:D43Lerner indexjel:G21Competition (economics)OligopolyPower (social and political)Competition; bankingjel:L13EconomicsRetail bankingPosition (finance)businessFinancemedia_commonJournal of International Money and Finance
researchProduct

Allocating cost reducing investments over competing divisions

2007

This paper examines a three-stage model of divisionalization where, first, two parent firms create independent units, second, the parent firms allocate cost reduction levels over these units, and third, the resulting units compete in a Cournot market given their current costs of production. The introduction of the cost reduction phase is shown to reduce the incentives toward divisionalization severely, relative to other existing models. Namely, the scope for divisionalization in equilibrium reduces as the marginal cost of the cost reducing investment decreases, and eventually vanishes. A second-best welfare analysis shows that, for any given market structure, the equilibrium investment deci…

Marginal costDivisionalization Horizontal Mergers Research Joint VenturesCournot competitionInvestment (macroeconomics)Divisionalization; Horizontal Mergers; Research Joint MergersCost reductionMicroeconomicsjel:L11jel:L22Market structureInvestment decisionsIncentivejel:L13EconomicsProduction (economics)divisionalization horizontal mergers research joint ventures
researchProduct

Les followers ont-ils vraiment de l'importance dans le modèle de Stackelberg?

2011

In this paper, we consider a T-stage linear model of Stackelberg oligopoly. First, we show geometrically and analytically that under the two conditions of linear market demand and identical constant marginal costs, the T-stage Stackelberg model reduces to a model where T oligopolies exploit residual demand sequentially. At any stage, leaders behave as if followers did not matter. Second, we study social welfare and convergence toward competitive equilibrium. Especially, we consider the velocity of convergence as the number of firms increases. The convergence is faster when reallocating firms from the most to the less populated cohort until equalizing the size of all cohorts.

Marginal costEconomics and Econometricsfollower's output indexíndice de producto del seguidorJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Marketsmodèle généralisé de Stackelberggeneralized Stackelberg competitioncompetencia de Stackelberg generalizadaCompetitive equilibriumrazón de descuento del markup del líderSupply and demandlcsh:Economic history and conditionsOligopolyjel:L20JEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Marketseconomía linealgeneralized Stackelberg competition.Stackelberg competitionEconomicsLeader’s markup discount factor linear economy follower’s output discount factor myopic behavior[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesfacteurs d'escompte markupJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives Organization and Behavior/L.L2.L20 - General[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceHB71-74lcsh:HB71-74Economic history and conditionsLinear modellcsh:Economics as a scienceConvergence (economics)HC10-1085leader's markup discount ratio[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives Organization and Behavior/L.L2.L20 - GeneralEconomics as a sciencelinear economyjel:L13leader's markup discount ratio linear economy follower's output index generalized Stackelberg competitionlcsh:HC10-1085économie linéaireStatistics Probability and UncertaintyConstant (mathematics)Mathematical economicsFinanceSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)
researchProduct

Equilibrium mergers in a composite good industry with efficiencies

2014

This paper studies equilibrium merging behavior in composite good industries. Component producers face the option to either merge with a similar component producer (horizontal merger) or a complementary one (complementary merger) of a composite good. Focusing only on strategic reasons, complementary mergers arise at equilibrium only when composite goods are very differentiated while horizontal mergers otherwise. Next, when efficiencies are considered, the level of marginal cost saving required for a horizontal merger in a composite industry to result in a non- increase in the upward price pressure index (UPPI) is greater as compared with the one in a regular industry. This result can be use…

Marginal costcomposite goods substitutes complements horizontal merger complementary merger efficiency effects UPPI diversion ratioL13business.industryL41Diversion ratioComputingMilieux_PERSONALCOMPUTINGPrice pressureInternational tradejel:L41Composite goodsSubstitutesComposite goodVertical mergerHorizontal mergerjel:L13Economicsddc:330businessGeneral Economics Econometrics and FinanceMerge (version control)Industrial organizationComplementsPublic financeEfficiency effects
researchProduct

Endogenous R&D Symmetry in Linear Duopoly with One-way Spillovers

2005

A duopoly model of cost reducing R&D-Cournot market competition is extended to encompass endogenous timing of R&D investments. Under the assumption that R&D spillovers are zero under simultaneous choices of R&D and only flow from the R&D leader to the follower under sequential choices, sequential and simultaneous play at the R&D stage are compared in order to assess the role of technological externalities in stimulating or attenuating endogenous firm asymmetry. The only timing structure of the R&D stage sustainable as subgame–perfect Nash equilibrium involves simultaneous play and thus zero spillovers.

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementEconomics and EconometricsStackelberg equilibriumEndogenous timingmedia_common.quotation_subjectjel:D43Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia ApplicataAsymmetryCompetition (economics)Microeconomicssymbols.namesakeStrategic investmentR&D with spillovers Firm AsymmetryStackelberg competitionEconomicsDuopolymedia_commonjel:C72Endogenous symmetryendogenous symmetry endogenous timing Stackelberg equilibriumjel:L11Nash equilibriumjel:L13symbolsendogenous timing stackelberg equilibriumSymmetry (geometry)Mathematical economicsSSRN Electronic Journal
researchProduct

Entry and exit in a vertically differentiated industry

2011

This paper presents a duopoly model of firm rivalry in a vertically differentiated industry when market dynamics is explicitly accounted for. It shows how the interplay between demand (degree of product differentiation, demand elasticity) and cost (fixed and quality costs) factors determine firms’ relative strength when quality is irreversible. The main strategic choices are product quality, price and the timing of entry and exit. Further, firms incur sunk quality costs at time of entry and operating fixed costs of maintaining quality. Although the low quality firm may outlast its rival in the declining phase, both firms wish to be the “quality leader”.

Price elasticity of demandEconomics and EconometricsComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSIONmedia_common.quotation_subjectProduct differentiationProduct (business)Microeconomicsjel:L11entry exit vertical product differentiationjel:L13Quality (business)BusinessFixed costQuality costsDuopolyRivalryIndustrial organizationmedia_commonActa Oeconomica
researchProduct