6533b7cffe1ef96bd1259811

RESEARCH PRODUCT

1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease

Martine GilardPamela S. DouglasGianluca PontoneBjarne L. NørgaardMark A. HlatkyAlan WilkDaniele AndreiniManesh R. PatelJesper M. JensenRobert A. ByrneFurong WangNick CurzenMartin HadamitzkyPlatform InvestigatorsHerwig SchuchlenzUlrich HinkCampbell RogersGudrun FeuchtnerMatthias GutberletGilles RioufolBernard De BruyneDerek D. CyrIan PurcellKaren Chiswell

subject

medicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industrymedicine.medical_treatmentFractional flow reserve030204 cardiovascular system & hematologymedicine.diseaseChest painRevascularization3. Good health030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of lifeConventional PCIMedicineMyocardial infarctionRadiologymedicine.symptomCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessMace

description

Abstract Background Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) plus estimation of fractional flow reserve using CTA (FFR CT ) safely and effectively guides initial care over 90 days in patients with stable chest pain. Longer-term outcomes are unknown. Objectives The study sought to determine the 1-year clinical, economic, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes of using FFR CT instead of usual care. Methods Consecutive patients with stable, new onset chest pain were managed by either usual testing (n = 287) or CTA (n = 297) with selective FFR CT (submitted in 201, analyzed in 177); 581 of 584 (99.5%) completed 1-year follow-up. Endpoints were adjudicated major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization), total medical costs, and QOL. Results Patients averaged 61 years of age with a mean 49% pre-test probability of coronary artery disease. At 1 year, MACE events were infrequent, with 2 in each arm of the planned invasive group and 1 in the planned noninvasive cohort (usual care strategy). In the planned invasive stratum, mean costs were 33% lower with CTA and selective FFR CT ($8,127 vs. $12,145 usual care; p  CT cost weight of zero ($3,049 FFR CT vs. $2,579; p = 0.82), but were higher when using an FFR CT cost weight equal to CTA. QOL scores improved overall at 1 year (p  CT vs. 0.07 for usual care; p = 0.02). Conclusions In patients with stable chest pain and planned invasive coronary angiography, care guided by CTA and selective FFR CT was associated with equivalent clinical outcomes and QOL, and lower costs, compared with usual care over 1-year follow-up. (The PLATFORM Study: Prospective LongitudinAl Trial of FFRct: Outcome and Resource IMpacts [PLATFORM]; NCT01943903 )

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057