6533b7d1fe1ef96bd125bf2f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Le renouvellement du contrôle juridictionnel de l’administration au moyen du recours pour excès de pouvoir

Brahim Ghezzou

subject

time-limitseffectiveness of controllegal security[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Lawjuge administratifquestion of factjurisdictional reviewrecevabilitéinstructiondélais de jugementinjonctionadministrationremedy for abuse of poweradministrédroits subjectifs[SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Lawinjunctionsources de légalitéefficacité du contrôlemeans of controladmissibilitydroits objectifs.judgmentcontrôle juridictionnelprocédures d’urgencepouvoir discrétionnaireinvestigationsources of legalityobjective rights.subjective rightsadministrative acttiersdiscretionary powerexecution of judgmentRecours pour excès de pouvoircontrol of opportunityacte administratifurgent proceedingsobjective controladministrative judgemoyens de contrôlejugementexécution de la chosée jugéeadministeredcontrôle objectifquestion de faitsécurité juridiquecontrôle d'opportunité

description

The role of the administrative judge (the excess of power) has evolved due to the implementation of the various texts adopted recently as well as the developments in the case-law in recent years. In many areas, its role now goes beyond the mere confrontation of an administrative act with the rule of law. At the heart of the annulment decision is a statement and an assessment of the facts, apart from the interpretation of the law, which were usually separated by the principle of separation between the administration and its judge.Some jurisprudence which has become very classical, as well as others more recent, can be considered as characteristic manifestations of this new tendency of the judge to impose a pragmatic reading of the law, to conceive a certain coherence between the applicable law and the reality of the facts, thus rendering useful any annulment contentious pronounced in this sense.

https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02242460