6533b7d7fe1ef96bd1267c1b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Automated classification of neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndromes using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in a clinical setting

Emma BiondettiLouise-laure MarianiJohann FaouziJohann FaouziBertrand DegosAlexis BriceM. VidailhetJean-christophe CorvolLydia ChougarMarie VillotteOlivier ColliotOlivier ColliotGwendoline DupontNadya PyatigorskayaRomain ValabregueDavid GrabliFlorence CormierStéphane LehéricyChristine PayanInes PiotRahul Gaurav

subject

medicine.medical_specialtymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryParkinsonismMagnetic resonance imagingmedicine.diseaseTraining cohortnervous system diseases030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingParkinsonian syndromes03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationstomatognathic systemnervous systemCategorizationmental disordersReplication (statistics)Research environmentCohortmedicinebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

ABSTRACTBackgroundSeveral studies have shown that machine learning algorithms using MRI data can accurately discriminate parkinsonian syndromes. Validation under clinical conditions is missing.ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy for the categorization of parkinsonian syndromes of a machine learning algorithm trained with a research cohort and tested on an independent clinical replication cohort.Methods361 subjects, including 94 healthy controls, 139 patients with PD, 60 with PSP with Richardson’s syndrome, 41 with MSA of the parkinsonian variant (MSA-P) and 27 with MSA of the cerebellar variant (MSA-P), were recruited. They were divided into a training cohort (n=179) scanned in a research environment, and a replication cohort (n=182), scanned in clinical conditions on different MRI systems. Volumes and DTI metrics in 13 brain regions were used as input for a supervised machine learning algorithm.ResultHigh accuracy was achieved using volumetry in the classification of PD versus PSP, PD versus MSA-P, PD versus MSA-C, PD versus atypical parkinsonian syndromes and PSP versus MSA-C in both cohorts, although slightly lower in the replication cohort (balanced accuracy: 0.800 to 0.915 in the training cohort; 0.741 to 0.928 in the replication cohort). Performance was lower in the classification of PSP versus MSA-P and MSA-P versus MSA-C. When adding DTI metrics, the performance tended to increase in the training cohort, but not in the replication cohort.ConclusionsA machine learning approach based on volumetric and DTI data can accurately classify subjects with early-stage parkinsonism, scanned on different MRI systems, in the setting of their clinical workup.

https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20042671