6533b7d9fe1ef96bd126c333
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The significance of epidermal growth factor receptor uncommon mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and critical appraisal
Umberto MalapelleChristian RolfoViviana BazanValerio GristinaSilvia TortoriciGiancarlo TronconeAntonio GalvanoAntonio RussoFrancesco PepePasquale Pisapiasubject
0301 basic medicineMaleLung NeoplasmsPrognosiEGFRProtein Kinase Inhibitormedicine.disease_causeNSCLC03 medical and health sciencesExonErbB Receptors0302 clinical medicineCarcinoma Non-Small-Cell LungmedicineCarcinomaHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingEpidermal growth factor receptorErbB ReceptorLung cancerGeneProtein Kinase InhibitorsRegulation of gene expressionMutationbiologybusiness.industryGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseasePrognosisTKIUncommon mutationErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation NeoplasticLung Neoplasm030104 developmental biologyTreatment OutcomeOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisNGSMutationCancer researchbiology.proteinSystematic reviewFemalebusinessHumandescription
Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations collectively account for 10% of EGFR mutations, harboring heterogeneous molecular alterations within exons 18-21 with clinically variable responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. In addition, with the introduction of different NGS gene approach an improvement of EGFR mutations detection was reported. Today, no specific studies have prospectively evaluated uncommon sensitizing mutations in detail and no firm standard of care has been established in the first-line setting. The aim of this comprehensive review is to critically consider the clinical role of uncommon EGFR mutations highlighting the results of several in vitro and in vivo studies, which singly evaluated the sensitivity of uncommon mutations to currently European of Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved EGFR TKIs in cell lines, xenograft models and humans, in order to obtain a practical guide for refining the clinical decision-making process.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 |