6533b7dbfe1ef96bd1270c1d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation in Patients with Chronic Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Vanesa Abuín-porrasBlanca De-la-cruz-torresCésar Calvo-loboCarlos Romero-moralesEmmanuel Navarro-floressubject
ChronaxieHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesismedicine.medical_treatmentPilot ProjectsChronic painlaw.invention0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawlateral epicondylalgiaFunctional abilityFisioterapiapercutaneous nerve stimulationPain MeasurementUltrasonography030222 orthopedicseducation.field_of_studyultrasoundNeuromodulationPercutaneous nerve stimulationRehabilitationRLateral epicondylalgiaChronic painAnesthesianeuromodulationMedicineEnfermeríaSistema nerviós Malaltieschronic painPopulationEnfermería Fisioterapia y PodologíaArticlerehabilitation03 medical and health sciencesUltrasoundmedicineTennis elbowHumansSistema musculoesqueléticoRadial nerveeducationNeurostimulationUltrasonography InterventionalRadial nervebusiness.industryPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthTennis Elbowmedicine.diseaseradial nerveRehabilitacióbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
Objective: The aim was to analyze effects of a percutaneous neuromodulation (PNM) treatment on the radial nerve, regarding pain, functionality, electrophysiologic excitability, and morphology, in patients with chronic lateral epicondylalgia (LE). Methods: Twenty-four patients with chronic unilateral elbow pain were recruited for this preliminary study and were divided into two groups: control (n = 12) and PNM group (n = 12). The subjects in the PNM group received percutaneous peripheral neurostimulation with an acupuncture needle that was located next to the nerve with ultrasound guidance. Pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS), functional ability using patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE), radial nerve cross-sectional area measured by ultrasound, and chronaxie and accommodation index (AI) measured by the strength–duration curve were evaluated. Results: Both groups showed no differences in the baseline measurements (all p = 0.001). However, at the end of the treatment, there were significant differences between groups since only the PNM group significantly improved their values compared to their baseline values: level of pain and cross-sectional area (CSA) values showed a significant decrease while the PRTEE scores showed a significant improvement. Then, regarding AI, the PNM group showed significant improvement for the electrophysiologic nerve excitability pattern, reporting normal function in all radial nerves after treatment (p = 0.001). However, chronaxie values always reported similar values with no differences between groups (p >
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-05-03 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |