6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1273698
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition
Loic BartamianAudrey MartinErminio SantangeloPierre-grégoire GuinotBelaid BouhemadMaxime NguyenVivien BerthoudPierre Voizeuxsubject
Vasopressinmedicine.medical_specialtyendocrine systemEvidence-based practicemedicine.medical_treatmentReviewvasopressorshocklaw.inventionnorepinephrineNorepinephrine (medication)Sepsissepsis03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawmedicineRenal replacement therapyIntensive care medicinebusiness.industrySeptic shockweaningR030208 emergency & critical care medicineGeneral Medicinemedicine.disease030228 respiratory systemShock (circulatory)Medicinemedicine.symptombusinesshormones hormone substitutes and hormone antagonistsmedicine.drugdescription
Despite the abundant literature on vasopressor therapy, few studies have focused on vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock. We performed a scoping-review of the published studies evaluating vasopressor-sparing strategies by analyzing the results from randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with shock, with a focus on vasopressor doses and/or duration reduction. We analyzed 143 studies, mainly performed in septic shock. Our analysis demonstrated that several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are associated with a decrease in the duration of vasopressor therapy. These strategies are as follows: implementing a weaning strategy, vasopressin use, systemic glucocorticoid administration, beta-blockers, and normothermia. On the contrary, early goal directed therapies, including fluid therapy, oral vasopressors, vitamin C, and renal replacement therapy, are not associated with an increase in vasopressor-free days. Based on these results, we proposed an evidence-based vasopressor management strategy.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-07-01 | Journal of Clinical Medicine |