6533b820fe1ef96bd1279b18

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Low-level laser therapy and anesthetic infiltration for orofacial pain in patients with fibromyalgia : a randomized clinical trial

De Souza RcLimeira-junior FaScudine KgDe Sousa EtMeira UmGomes AcDe Oliveira E Silva Em

subject

MaleOrofacial painFibromyalgiaLidocainemedicine.medical_treatmentlaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled trialFacial PainlawPain assessmentFibromyalgiaHumansPain ManagementMedicineAnesthetics LocalLow-Level Light TherapyAdverse effectGeneral DentistryLow level laser therapybusiness.industryResearchLidocaine030206 dentistryMiddle AgedMedically compromised patients in Dentistrymedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]OtorhinolaryngologyAnesthesiaUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASAnestheticFemaleSurgeryLasers Semiconductormedicine.symptombusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryAnesthesia Localmedicine.drug

description

Background To compare the analgesic effect of anesthetic infiltration of lidocaine 2% and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) by GaAlAs into tender points of patients with orofacial pain and fibromyalgia (FM). Material and Methods A randomized clinical trial was performed with adults (N=66) that were allocated into two groups (1:1): Group A received LLLT irradiation by Diode Laser GaAlAs (780nm) with expositions twice a week during six weeks and Group B was treated with anesthetic infiltration of lidocaine 2% without vasoconstrictor once a week for four weeks. The pain assessment included the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and tenderness to palpation. Results No dropout and adverse effect was observed during the study. The pain decreased significantly in each group after the treatment (p=0.0001, β=1.0), even though no statistical difference was found between both treatments (p=0.46, β= 0.82). The presence of tender points decreased after both treatments, with responsively in some types of masticatory muscles (p<0.05) except posterior temporalis muscle. The patients’ perception showed that both treatments were effective and a few patients reported that the treatment did not improve welfare. Conclusions The LLLT by GaAlAs and anesthetic infiltration of lidocaine 2% were equally effective to control orofacial pain in FM individuals. Key words:Facial pain, myalgia, rheumatic disease, local anesthesia, phototherapy.

http://hdl.handle.net/10550/65962