6533b821fe1ef96bd127b093

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Improvement in risk stratification with the combination of the tumour marker antigen carbohydrate 125 and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute heart failure.

Julio NúñezGregg C. FonarowÀNgel LlàcerFrancisco J. ChorroJuan SanchisGema MiñanaVicent BodíVicente Bertomeu-gonzalezMaría J. BoschArturo CarrataláLuciano ConsuegraEduardo Núñez

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyendocrine system diseasesHeart diseasemedicine.drug_classKaplan-Meier EstimateGastroenterologyRisk AssessmentAntigenInternal medicineNatriuretic Peptide BrainNatriuretic peptidemedicineHumansTumor markerAgedAged 80 and overHeart Failurebusiness.industryProportional hazards modelMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseBrain natriuretic peptidePrognosisEndocrinologyHeart failureCA-125 AntigenAcute DiseaseFemaleCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineRisk assessmentbusinesshormones hormone substitutes and hormone antagonistsBiomarkers

description

Aim Elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and tumour marker antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) levels have shown to be associated with higher risk for adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Nevertheless, no attempt has been made to explore the utility of combining these two biomarkers. We sought to assess whether CA125 adds prognostic value to BNP in predicting 6-month all-cause mortality in patients with AHF. Methods and results We analysed 1111 consecutive patients admitted for AHF. Antigen carbohydrate 125 (U/mL) and BNP (pg/mL) were measured at a median of 72 ± 12 h after instauration of treatment. Antigen carbohydrate 125 and BNP were dichotomized based on proposed prognostic cutpoints, and a variable with four categories was formed (BNP–CA125): C1 = BNP < 350 and CA125 < 60 ( n = 394); C2 = BNP ≥ 350 and CA125 < 60 ( n = 165); C3 = BNP < 350 and CA125 ≥ 60 ( n = 331); and C4 = BNP ≥ 350 and CA125 ≥ 60 ( n = 221). The independent association between BNP–CA125 and mortality was assessed with the Cox regression analysis, and their added predictive ability tested by the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index. At 6 months, 181 deaths (16.3%) were identified. The cumulative rate of mortality was lower for patients in C1 (7.8%), intermediate for C2 and C3 (17.8% and 16.9%, respectively), and higher for C4 (37.2%), and P -value for trend <0.001. After adjusting for established risk factors, the highest risk was observed when both biomarkers were elevated (C4 vs. C1: HR = 4.05, 95% CI = 2.54–6.45; P < 0.001) and intermediate when only one of them was elevated: (C2 vs. C1: HR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.00–2.93; P = 0.050) and (C3 vs. C1: HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.30–3.39; P = 0.002). Moreover, when CA125 was added to the clinical model + BNP, a 10.4% ( P < 0.0001) improvement in the IDI (on the relative scale) was found. Conclusion In patients admitted with AHF, CA125 added prognostic value beyond the information provided by BNP, and thus, their combination enables better 6-month risk stratification.

10.1093/eurheartj/ehq142https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20501480