6533b825fe1ef96bd128331e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Spelling out consequences : conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process

Riikka Nissi

subject

Linguistics and Languagelongitudinal dataProcess managementconversation analysisSocial PsychologyOperations researchComputer sciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectDiscourse analysista6121Language and LinguisticsMultimodality0502 economics and businessConversationconditional constructionsdiscourse analysismultimodalitymultimodaalisuusmedia_common060201 languages & linguisticskeskustelunanalyysiCommunication05 social sciences06 humanities and the artshypothetical situationWork lifeSpellingdiskurssianalyysiPlanning processConversation analysisWork (electrical)Anthropology0602 languages and literatureproposalsorganisational planningrejectionmeeting interaction050203 business & management

description

Organisational planning processes often materialise as a series of meetings, where the future of the organisation is jointly discussed and negotiated as a part of local decision-making sequences. Using conversation and discourse analytical approaches, this article investigates how proposals concerning the future can also be resisted by employing a specific device, a conditional construction ( if X, then Y). The data for the study originate from a city organisation, whose customer services are being developed. The results show how the conditional constructions work in two interrelated ways. First, by introducing a problematic hypothetical situation, they outline the undesirable consequences of the proposed idea in real work life. Second, by highlighting the experience of the customer, they present the organisation as benefitting from the potential rejection of the idea. The article discusses the implications of the results for the study of proposal and decision-making sequences in longitudinal, multisemiotic discursive processes.

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201605092454