6533b826fe1ef96bd1283ef2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Covariation and phenotypic integration in chemical communication displays: biosynthetic constraints and eco-evolutionary implications

Stefan DötterlLena JohnMarcel E. VisserBerhane T. WeldegergisNicole M. Van DamDani Lucas-barbosaThomas SchmittAstrid T. GrootAstrid T. GrootChristian KostChristian KostBodil K. EhlersTobias G. KöllnerRobert A. RagusoNiels O. VerhulstFlorian EtlFlorian EtlFlorian MenzelLuisa AmoCassie J. MajeticMartin HeilAndré KesslerErik H. PoelmanSara D. LeonhardtRenee M. BorgesJonas KupplerDorothea ThollJonathan GershenzonMathias HoffmeisterJames D. BlandeJoachim RutherRobert GlinwoodRieta GolsStefan JarauRobert R. JunkerRemy S. PasquetAnne Amélie C. Larue-kontićFlorian P. SchiestlSybille B. UnsickerAmy L. ParachnowitschJarmo K. HolopainenJette T. KnudsenMarcel Dicke

subject

0106 biological sciences0301 basic medicineEco evolutionaryanalysisPhysiologyPlant ScienceAnimal Breeding and GenomicsBiologyfloral scentsChemical communicationFloral scentsphenotypic integration010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesChemical communication03 medical and health sciencesPhenotypic integrationbiosynthetic constraintsFokkerij en Genomicavegetative scentsLaboratory of Entomologycorrelation networkEcologyOrganic Chemistrychemical communicationPhenotypic integrationInsect pheromonesPE&RCLaboratorium voor Entomologiecorrelation network analysisOrganische ChemieCorrelation network analysisBiosynthetic constraints030104 developmental biologyEvolutionary biologyinternationalFloral scentIdentification (biology)EPSVegetative scents

description

Chemical communication is ubiquitous. The identification of conserved structural elements in visual and acoustic communication is well established, but comparable information on chemical communication displays (CCDs) is lacking. We assessed the phenotypic integration of CCDs in a meta‐analysis to characterize patterns of covariation in CCDs and identified functional or biosynthetically constrained modules. Poorly integrated plant CCDs (i.e. low covariation between scent compounds) support the notion that plants often utilize one or few key compounds to repel antagonists or to attract pollinators and enemies of herbivores. Animal CCDs (mostly insect pheromones) were usually more integrated than those of plants (i.e. stronger covariation), suggesting that animals communicate via fixed proportions among compounds. Both plant and animal CCDs were composed of modules, which are groups of strongly covarying compounds. Biosynthetic similarity of compounds revealed biosynthetic constraints in the covariation patterns of plant CCDs. We provide a novel perspective on chemical communication and a basis for future investigations on structural properties of CCDs. This will facilitate identifying modules and biosynthetic constraints that may affect the outcome of selection and thus provide a predictive framework for evolutionary trajectories of CCDs in plants and animals.

https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14505