6533b826fe1ef96bd1283f4c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Tinkering with the two-to-one interview: Reflections on the use of two interviewers in qualitative constructionist inquiry
Javier MonforteJoan ÚBeda-colomersubject
Active involvementInterviewQualitative interviewsGeneral EngineeringStrict constructionismPhysical activityMethodologyInterviewerSocial constructionismSocial constructionismBF1-990Qualitative interviewingAction (philosophy)PedagogyTwo-to-one interviewMethodsPsychologySociologydescription
Abstract Typically, qualitative interviews implicate a single interviewer. In this article, we consider an alternative comprising the simultaneous, active involvement of two interviewers. We base our considerations on experiences using the two-to-one interview in a nationwide research project on disability and physical activity. In addition to untapping and developing a qualitative interview method, the article provides an example in action of tinkering in qualitative inquiry. Tinkering entails a constant questioning of what to do, what is best, and what is appropriate within each moment of the research. Echoing social constructionist scholars, we argue that this flexible approach is useful to move away from methodological prescription and predictability.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | Methods in Psychology |