6533b827fe1ef96bd1286f42

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: what has changed over time?

Fabio ZattoniIsabel HeideggerVeeru KasivisvanathanVeeru KasivisvanathanAlexander KretschmerGiancarlo MarraAlessandro MagliFelix PreisserDerya TilkiDerya TilkiIgor TsaurMassimo ValerioRoderick Van Den BerghClaudia KeschFrancesco CeciChristian FankhauserGiorgio Gandaglia

subject

Biochemical recurrenceOncologymedicine.medical_specialtyRD1-811medicine.medical_treatmentMedizinReviewDisease030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging03 medical and health sciencesProstate cancer0302 clinical medicineInternal medicinebiochemical recurrencegenomic classifiersmedicineddc:610hormonal therapyProstatectomybusiness.industrysalvage radiotherapyprostate cancermedicine.diseaseRadiation therapyadjuvant radiotherapy; biochemical recurrence; genomic classifiers; hormonal therapy; prostate cancer; salvage radiotherapy030220 oncology & carcinogenesisHormonal therapySurgeryHormone therapybusinessadjuvant radiotherapyAdjuvant

description

The role and timing of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. While recent trials support the oncological safety of early salvage RT (SRT) compared to adjuvant RT (ART) in selected patients, previous randomized studies demonstrated that ART might improve recurrence-free survival in patients at high risk for local recurrence based on adverse pathology. Although ART might improve survival, this approach is characterized by a risk of overtreatment in up to 40% of cases. SRT is defined as the administration of RT to the prostatic bed and to the surrounding tissues in the patient with PSA recurrence after surgery but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The delivery of salvage therapies exclusively in men who experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) has the potential advantage of reducing the risk of side effects without theoretically compromising outcomes. However, how to select patients at risk of progression who are more likely to benefit from a more aggressive treatment after RP, the exact timing of RT after RP, and the use of hormone therapy and its duration at the time of RT are still open issues. Moreover, what the role of novel imaging techniques and genomic classifiers are in identifying the most optimal post-operative management of PCa patients treated with RP is yet to be clarified. This narrative review summarizes most relevant published data to guide a multidisciplinary team in selecting appropriate candidates for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.

http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/files/62040/fsurg-08-691473.pdf