6533b829fe1ef96bd1289971

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Are maximizers more normative decision-makers? An experimental investigation of maximizers' susceptibility to cognitive biases

Eric RuthruffPalmira FaraciRaffaella MisuracaFrancesco Ceresia

subject

media_common.quotation_subjectHeuristicCognitive biasNeglectBase rateFraming (construction)Cognitive biaseMaximizerNormativePositive economicsPsychologyGeneral PsychologyDecision-makingmedia_common

description

Abstract The present study tested the hypothesis that maximizers – people who routinely seek to make optimal decisions rather than quickly settling for an acceptable one – are less susceptible to cognitive biases. Experiment 1 showed that high maximizers are less swayed by irrelevant differences in the framing of a decision-making scenario than are low maximizers. Experiment 2 confirmed that maximizers are also less likely to neglect important base rate information when making decisions. Experiment 3 showed that maximizers are less likely to stick with a bad plan in which they have already invested (the sunk-cost bias) and therefore are quicker to switch to a more attractive alternative plan. Thus, we conclude that maximizers are generally more normative decision-makers. The present study also confirms the importance of using refined maximizing scales.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111123