6533b82efe1ef96bd1293eb6

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Occupational Heat Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk in the MCC-Spain Study.

Javier LlorcaGuillermo Fernández-tardónInés Gómez-aceboManolis KogevinasNuria AragonésMiguel SantibáñezMarcela GuevaraYolanda BenaventeLeire GilMichelle C. TurnerDolores SalasMarina PollánAlice HinchliffeGemma Castaño-vinyalsEva ArdanazAna M. GarcíaAna M. GarcíaJuan AlguacilVictor MorenoRafael Marcos-grageraAlba Marcos-delgadoPilar AmianoMiguel ÁNgel AlbaVicente MartinBeatriz Pérez-gómez

subject

0301 basic medicineAdultHot TemperatureEpidemiologyPopulationJob-exposure matrixCumulative ExposureBreast NeoplasmsDisease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineBreast cancerRisk FactorsEnvironmental healthOccupational ExposureMedicineHumanseducationAgedAged 80 and overeducation.field_of_studybusiness.industryConfoundingOdds ratioMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalOccupational Diseases030104 developmental biologyOncologySpain030220 oncology & carcinogenesisCase-Control StudiesFemalebusiness

description

Background: Mechanisms linking occupational heat exposure with chronic diseases have been proposed. However, evidence on occupational heat exposure and cancer risk is limited. Methods: We evaluated occupational heat exposure and female breast cancer risk in a large Spanish case-control study. We enrolled 1,738 breast cancer cases and 1,910 frequency-matched population controls. A Spanish job exposure matrix, MatEmEsp, was used to assign estimates of the proportion of workers exposed (P greater than or equal to 25% for at least one year) and work time with heat stress (wet bulb globe temperature ISO 7243) for each occupation. We used three exposure indices: ever vs. never exposed, lifetime cumulative exposure and duration of exposure (years). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), applying a lag-period of 5 years, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Ever occupational heat exposure was associated with a moderate but statistically significant higher risk of breast cancer (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.01, 1.46), with significant trends across categories of lifetime cumulative exposure and duration (p-trend = 0.01 and 0.03 respectively). Stronger associations were found for hormone receptor positive disease (OR ever exposure = 1.38; 95% CI 1.12, 1.67). We found no confounding effects from multiple other common occupational exposures, however results attenuated with adjustment for occupational detergent exposure. Conclusions: This study provides some evidence of an association between occupational heat exposure and female breast cancer risk. Impact: Our results contribute substantially to the scientific literature. Further investigations are needed, considering multiple occupational exposures.

https://fundanet.fisabio.san.gva.es/publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=9341