6533b82ffe1ef96bd1294714

RESEARCH PRODUCT

University-wide, top-down curriculum reform at a Finnish university: perceptions of the academic staff

Sanna HonkimäkiPäivi TynjäläJoachim KratochvilPäivikki Jääskelä

subject

academic staffHigher educationCurriculum planningmedia_common.quotation_subject050905 science studiesEducationtop-down managementPerceptionPolitical sciencetyöntekijätkorkeakoulutCurriculumcurriculum planningmedia_commonMedical educationbusiness.industry05 social sciences050301 educationTop-down and bottom-up designmuutosjohtaminenhigher educationkorkeakouluhallintocurriculum reformuudistukset0509 other social sciencesbusiness0503 educationAdministration (government)opetussuunnitelmat

description

This study examines academic staff’s perceptions of a university-wide, top-down curriculum reform in terms of the management of the reform, the support provided by the university’s administration, and the utilisation of the university’s guidelines. Differences between faculties are also scrutinised. The study was conducted at a multidisciplinary public research university in Finland using the survey method. The data (n = 394) consisted of academic staff’s responses to multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analyses, and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilised to analyse the quantitative data. Responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using thematic analysis. The academic staff expressed discontent with the management and support provided by the university even though they had proceeded according to the university’s guidelines. Significant differences concerning the perceived management and support and reported utilisation of the university’s guidelines were found between the personnel of different faculties. The results indicate that a top-down curriculum reform creates conflict between the academics’ own ideas regarding curriculum planning and those of the senior management and university administration. peerReviewed

https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1906727