6533b82ffe1ef96bd12947be
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Plastic foil technique attenuates inflammation in mesenteric intravital microscopy.
Hans-anton LehrGeorg HorstickT. Axel HeimannMichael LauterbachLaszlo KopaczT. Manfred OssendorfSucharit BhakdiOliver KempskiTibor KempfJürgen Meyersubject
MalePathologymedicine.medical_specialtyHemodynamicsMicrocirculationRats Sprague-DawleyMedicineAnimalsSplanchnic CirculationRespiratory systemMesenteryFOIL methodSerum AlbuminInflammationMicroscopybusiness.industryMicrocirculationHemodynamicsBlood flowCarbon DioxideRatsOxygenmedicine.anatomical_structureHematocritSurgeryBase excessFemaleNuclear medicinebusinessIntravital microscopyBlood Flow Velocitydescription
Abstract Background. Interpretation of intravital microscopic observations is complicated by the “inflammatory”-type response to the trauma inflicted on the tissue by the surgical preparation. The present study evaluates different experimental conditions for prolonged observations of the mesenteric microcirculation in the rat. Methods. The mesentery was exteriorized through a median laparotomy and subjected to an organ bath or a modified plastic foil technique. Hemodynamic, metabolic, respiratory, and microcirculatory data were analyzed. Results. In contrast to the plastic foil technique, which yielded stable baseline values over a 5-h observation period, venular velocity and wall shear rates decreased significantly in the organ bath technique, and leukocyte adhesion to the endothelium was significantly increased. Likewise, abdominal blood flow decreased significantly by 35% and base excess declined (−10.0 ± 0.4 mmol/L) in the organ bath, with reduced p co 2 (26.4 ± 2.5 mm Hg vs 33.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg in plastic foil technique) due to respiratory pH compensation. Conclusions. The plastic foil technique was found clearly superior to the organ bath technique for maintenance of stable baseline metabolic, hemodynamic, and microcirculatory conditions in mesenteric intravital microscopy.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2000-11-01 | The Journal of surgical research |