6533b830fe1ef96bd1297047

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Efficacy of Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of Endodontic Microsurgery. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

José María Montiel-companyCésar Castillo-amatureJesús Mena-álvarezÁLvaro Zubizarreta-macho

subject

medicine.medical_treatmentlcsh:MedicineReview03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine0502 economics and businessMedicinecomputer-aided techniqueApex locationstatic navigationapicoectomyOrthodonticsbusiness.industry05 social scienceslcsh:RPrediction intervalapex root-end location030206 dentistryGeneral MedicineRandom effects modelConfidence intervalendodontic surgerySystematic reviewMeta-analysisApicoectomyComputer-aided050211 marketingbusiness

description

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy of the computer-aided static navigation technique on the accuracy of root apex location in endodontic microsurgery. Material and Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, of clinical studies that evaluated the apex location rate of the computer-aided static navigation techniques applied to endodontic microsurgery. A total of four databases were consulted in the literature search: Pubmed-Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. After eliminating duplicated articles and applying the inclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for the qualitative and the quantitative analysis. Results: The root apex location success rate stated at 96.8% (confidence interval (CI): 93.0–100%) of the cases performed through a computer-aided static navigation technique. The prediction interval ranges from 91.4% to 100%. The meta-analysis did not detect heterogeneity between the combined studies (Q-test = 6.15; p-value = 0.407; I2 = 2.4%). The computer-aided static navigation techniques showed a root apex location success rate 27 times higher than conventional endodontic microsurgery procedures (Q test = 0.80; p = 0.671; I2 = 0%). Three studies of computer-aided static navigation techniques and control group were compared using a random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method with a statistically significant odds success ratio of 27.7, with a 95% confidence interval between 11.3 and 68.1 (z test = 7.23; p 0.0001). Conclusions: According to in vitro studies analyzed, endodontic microsurgeries performed through computer-aided static navigation techniques show a high precision.

10.3390/jcm10020313https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/2/313