6533b832fe1ef96bd129ae76

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Graphene Field-Effect Transistors Employing Different Thin Oxide Films: A Comparative Study

Christian ReitzMarco A. GiambraRiccardo PerniceWolfram H. P. PerniceWolfram H. P. PerniceE.f. CalandraAlessandro BusaccaFilippo FabbriAntonio BenfanteRomain DanneauSalvatore StivalaRalph KrupkeRalph KrupkeVaidotas MiseikisVaidotas Miseikis

subject

TechnologyMaterials scienceGeneral Chemical EngineeringOxide02 engineering and technologyDielectricSettore ING-INF/01 - Elettronica7. Clean energy01 natural sciencesArticlelaw.inventionlcsh:Chemistrychemistry.chemical_compoundlawGraphene Field-Effect Transistors Microwaves Oxide Films0103 physical sciences010302 applied physicsbusiness.industryGrapheneDirect currentTransistorGeneral Chemistry021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyTitanium oxidelcsh:QD1-999chemistry2018-020-021849ALDOptoelectronicsGraphene0210 nano-technologybusinessddc:600Short circuitMicrowave

description

In this work, we report on a comparison among graphene field-effect transistors (GFETs) employing different dielectrics as gate layers to evaluate their microwave response. In particular, aluminum oxide (Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$), titanium oxide (TiO$_{2}$), and hafnium oxide (HfO$_{2}$) have been tested. GFETs have been fabricated on a single chip and a statistical analysis has been performed on a set of 24 devices for each type of oxide. Direct current and microwave measurements have been carried out on such GFETs and short circuit current gain and maximum available gain have been chosen as quality factors to evaluate their microwave performance. Our results show that all of the devices belonging to a specific group (i.e., with the same oxide) have a well-defined performance curve and that the choice of hafnium oxide represents the best trade-off in terms of dielectric properties. Graphene transistors employing HfO$_{2}$ as the dielectric layer, in fact, exhibit the best performance in terms of both the cutoff frequency and the maximum frequency of oscillation.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02836