6533b834fe1ef96bd129cd28

RESEARCH PRODUCT

In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding

Charles MacleodZhen QiuAnthony GachaganTheodosia StratoudakiYashar JavadiRandika K. W. VithanageMomchil VasilevNina E. SweeneyStephen PierceDavid LinesCarmelo MineoCarmelo MineoEhsan Mohseni

subject

Materials scienceCalibration (statistics)TKMechanical engineering02 engineering and technologyWeldingIn-process calibration010402 general chemistry01 natural scienceslaw.inventionRobot weldingAcceptance testinglawNondestructive testinglcsh:TA401-492General Materials ScienceRobotic weldingIn-process welding and inspectionRobotic non-destructive testingbusiness.industryMechanical EngineeringProcess (computing)Phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT)021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyIntentionally embedded weld defectsSizing0104 chemical sciencesMechanics of Materialslcsh:Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materialsUltrasonic sensor0210 nano-technologybusiness

description

Abstract In multi-pass welding, there is increasing motivation to move towards in-process defect detection to enable real-time repair; thus avoiding deposition of more layers over a defective weld pass. All defect detection techniques require a consistent and repeatable approach to calibration to ensure that measured defect sizing is accurate. Conventional approaches to calibration employ fixed test blocks with known defect sizes, however, this methodology can lead to incorrect sizing when considering complex geometries, materials with challenging microstructure, and the significant thermal gradients present in materials during the inter-pass inspection period. To circumvent these challenges, the authors present a novel approach to calibration and introduce the concept of in-process calibration applied to ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). The new concept is centred around the manufacturing of a second duplication sample, containing intentionally-embedded tungsten inclusions, with identical process parameters as the main sample. Both samples are then inspected using a high-temperature robotic NDT process to allow direct comparative measurements to be established between the real part and the calibration sample. It is demonstrated that in-process weld defect detection using the in-process calibration technique can more reliably identify defects in samples which would otherwise pass the acceptance test using a traditional calibration.

10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108981http://hdl.handle.net/10447/430132