6533b836fe1ef96bd12a0b45
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Joint constraints on galaxy bias and σ8 through the N-pdf of the galaxy number density
J. L. SanzEnn SaarEnn SaarPablo Arnalte-murVicent J. MartínezP. VielvaSilvestre Paredessubject
PhysicsNumber densityCold dark matter010308 nuclear & particles physicsModel selectionDark matterEstimatorAstronomy and AstrophysicsProbability density functionAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics01 natural sciencesGalaxy0103 physical sciencesStatistical physics010303 astronomy & astrophysicsGalaxy clusterAstrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysicsdescription
We present a full description of the N-probability density function of the galaxy number density fluctuations. This N-pdf is given in terms, on the one hand, of the cold dark matter correlations and, on the other hand, of the galaxy bias parameter. The method relies on the assumption commonly adopted that the dark matter density fluctuations follow a local non-linear transformation of the initial energy density perturbations. The N-pdf of the galaxy number density fluctuations allows for an optimal estimation of the bias parameter (e.g., via maximum-likelihood estimation, or Bayesian inference if there exists any a priori information on the bias parameter), and of those parameters defining the dark matter correlations, in particular its amplitude ($\sigma_8$). It also provides the proper framework to perform model selection between two competitive hypotheses. The parameters estimation capabilities of the N-pdf are proved by SDSS-like simulations (both ideal log-normal simulations and mocks obtained from Las Damas simulations), showing that our estimator is unbiased. We apply our formalism to the 7th release of the SDSS main sample (for a volume-limited subset with absolute magnitudes $M_r \leq -20$). We obtain $\hat{b} = 1.193 \pm 0.074$ and $\hat{\sigma_8} = 0.862 \pm 0.080$, for galaxy number density fluctuations in cells of a size of $30h^{-1}$Mpc. Different model selection criteria show that galaxy biasing is clearly favoured.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-06-25 |