6533b836fe1ef96bd12a1497

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of electronic cigarette liquids on human mucosal tissue cultures of the oropharynx

Sabina Schwenk-ziegerPhilipp BaumeisterFriedrich IhlerSven BeckerChristian WelzVincent StuckeMartin Canis

subject

AdultMalePathologymedicine.medical_specialtyOropharyngeal TissueDNA damageCell SurvivalHealth Toxicology and MutagenesisOropharynxElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsToxicologyPathology and Forensic Medicine03 medical and health sciencesTissue cultureYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineFresh TissueRisk FactorsGermanyMedicineHumansCarcinogenMucous Membranebusiness.industryCytotoxinsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseHead and neck squamous-cell carcinoma3. Good health030228 respiratory systemHead and Neck NeoplasmsToxicityCancer researchCarcinoma Squamous CellDNA fragmentationFemalebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryDNA DamageMutagens

description

The popularity of electronic cigarettes (ECs) is rapidly growing and ECs are claimed to be an uncritically regarded alternative to conventional cigarettes. The mucosal tissue of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) is the first contact organ for xenobiotics such as liquids of ECs. The aim of this study is to investigate the bimolecular effects of e-liquids on human pharyngeal tissue cultures to evaluate whether e-liquids and their components present a risk factor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Fresh tissue samples of healthy oropharyngeal mucosa were assembled into mucosal tissue cultures. Two fruit-flavored liquids (FLs), one tobacco-flavored liquid (TL) (all containing nicotine), and the corresponding base mixtures (free of nicotine and flavor) were used in three different dilutions. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the water-soluble tetrazolium-8 assay. DNA fragmentation was quantified using alkaline microgel electrophoresis. All liquids caused a significant reduction in cell viability. FLs especially showed a higher toxicity than TL. DNA fragmentation significantly increased by incubation with FL, whereas treatment with TL did not show serious DNA damage. E-liquids are cytotoxic to oropharyngeal tissue, and some liquids can induce relevant DNA damage. Thus, mutagenicity for mucosa of the UADT and e-liquids as risk factors for head and neck cancer cannot entirely be ruled out. Only the implementation of standards and regulations for liquid production and distribution can ensure a valid scientific investigation and assessment of carcinogenic potential of long-term EC use.

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85006365243&partnerID=MN8TOARS