6533b837fe1ef96bd12a31b9
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Influence of Corneal Opacity on Intraocular Pressure Assessment in Patients with Lysosomal Storage Diseases
Norbert PfeifferKatharina BellKatrin LorenzJoanna Wasielica-poslednikIrene SchmidtmannSusanne PitzGiuseppe Politinosubject
MaleIntraocular pressureVisual acuityEye Diseasesgenetic structuresVisionVisual AcuitySocial Scienceslcsh:MedicineGlaucomaCorneaCorneal Opacity0302 clinical medicineCorneaMedicine and Health SciencesPsychologyCornea verticillatalcsh:ScienceOptical PropertiesMultidisciplinaryCorneal opacityMiddle Agedmedicine.anatomical_structurePhysical SciencesSensory PerceptionFemaleAnatomyCellular Structures and Organellesmedicine.symptomStatistics (Mathematics)Research ArticleOpacityAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentOcular AnatomyMaterials ScienceMaterial PropertiesCorneal hysteresis03 medical and health sciencesOcular SystemOphthalmologyConfidence IntervalsmedicineHumansIn patientIntraocular PressureAgedbusiness.industrylcsh:RBiology and Life SciencesGlaucomaCell BiologyMucopolysaccharidosesmedicine.diseaseeye diseasesOphthalmology030221 ophthalmology & optometryEyeslcsh:Qsense organsLysosomesbusinessHeadMathematics030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNeurosciencedescription
Aims To investigate an influence of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS)- and Morbus Fabry-associated corneal opacities on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and to evaluate the concordance of the different tonometry methods. Methods 25 MPS patients with or without corneal clouding, 25 Fabry patients with cornea verticillata ≥ grade 2 and 25 healthy age matched controls were prospectively included into this study. Outcome measures: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT); palpatory assessment of IOP; Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), corneal resistance factor (CRF) and corneal hysteresis (CH) assessed by Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA); central corneal thickness (CCT) and density assessed with Pentacam. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed effect models and Spearman correlation coefficients. The concordance between tonometry methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Results There was no relevant difference between study groups regarding median GAT, IOPg, IOPcc and CCT measurements. The limits of agreement between GAT and IOPcc/IOPg/palpatory IOP in MPS were: [-11.7 to 12.1mmHg], [-8.6 to 15.5 mmHg] and [- 5.4 to 10.1 mmHg] respectively. Limits of agreement were less wide in healthy subjects and Fabry patients. Palpatory IOP was higher in MPS than in healthy controls and Fabry patients. Corneal opacity correlated more strongly with GAT, IOPg, CH, CRF, CCT and corneal density in MPS (r = 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, 0.7, 0.6, 0.6 respectively) than in Fabry patients (r = 0.3, 0.2, -0.03, 0.1, 0.3, -0.2 respectively). In contrast, IOPcc revealed less correlation with corneal opacity than GAT in MPS (r = 0.2 vs. 0.4). Conclusions ORA and GAT render less comparable IOP-values in patients suffering from MPS-associated corneal opacity in comparison to Fabry and healthy controls. The IOP seems to be overestimated in opaque MPS-affected corneas. GAT, IOPg and biomechanical parameters of the cornea correlate more strongly with the corneal clouding than IOPcc in MPS patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01695161
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-01-12 | PLOS ONE |