6533b852fe1ef96bd12aabc3
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Involuntary ambulatory triage during the COVID-19 pandemic – A neurosurgical perspective
Christoph BettagHarald KrenzlinVeit RohdeNaureen KericFlorian Ringelsubject
MaleEuropean PeopleCritical Care and Emergency MedicinePulmonologyEpidemiologyGerman PeopleNeurosurgical ProceduresGeographical locationsNervous System ProceduresPatient Admission0302 clinical medicineGermanyPandemicEpidemiologyMedicine and Health SciencesEthnicitiesAged 80 and overeducation.field_of_studyMultidisciplinaryQRMiddle AgedHospitals3. Good healthEuropeElective Surgical Procedures030220 oncology & carcinogenesisQuarantineAmbulatoryMedicineFemaleNeurosurgeryMedical emergencyCoronavirus InfectionsEmergency Service HospitalElective Surgical ProcedureResearch ArticleAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentSciencePneumonia ViralPopulationNeurosurgerySurgical and Invasive Medical ProceduresEpidemiology ; Neurosurgency ; COVID-19 ; Hospitals ; Surgical and invasive medical procedures ; Respiratory infections ; German people ; Germany ; Critical care and emergency medicineBetacoronavirusYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesmedicineHumansEuropean UnioneducationPandemicsAgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2business.industryCOVID-19Retrospective cohort studymedicine.diseaseTriageHealth CareHealth Care FacilitiesPeople and PlacesRespiratory InfectionsPopulation GroupingsEmergenciesTriagebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses an unprecedented challenge to health-care systems around the world. As approximately one-third of the world´s population is living under "lockdown" conditions, medical resources are being reallocated and hospital admissions are limited to emergencies. We examined the decision-making impact of these actions and their effects on access to hospital treatment in patients with neurosurgical conditions.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzes hospital admissions of two major neurosurgical services in Germany during the nationwide lockdown period (March 16th to April 16th, 2020). Spinal or cranial conditions requiring immediate hospital admission and treatment constituted emergencies.ResultsA total of 243 in-patients were treated between March 16th and April 16th 2020 (122 patients at the University Medical Center Mainz, 121 patients at the University Medical Center Göttingen). Of these, 38.0±16% qualified as emergency admission. Another 1,688 admissions were reviewed during the same periods in 2018 and 2019, providing a frame of reference. Overall, emergency admissions declined by 44.7±0.7% during lockdown. Admissions for cranial emergencies fell by 48.1±4.44%, spinal emergencies by 30.9±14.6%.ConclusionAbove findings indicate that in addition to postponing elective procedures, emergency admissions were dramatically curtailed during the COVID-19 lockdown. As this surely is unexpected and unintended, reasons are undoubtedly complex. As consequences in morbidity and mortality are still unpredictable, efforts should be made to accommodate all patients in need of hospital access going forward.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-06-18 | PLOS ONE |