6533b852fe1ef96bd12ab86e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Source strength determination in iridium-192 and cobalt-60 brachytherapy : A European survey on the level of agreement between clinical measurements and manufacturer certificates
Jose Perez-calatayudPanagiotis PapagiannisDimos BaltasDimos BaltasMark J. RivardFacundo BallesterFrank-andré SiebertÅSa Carlsson TedgrenÅSa Carlsson TedgrenÅSa Carlsson TedgrenJavier VijandeJavier VijandeLarry De Werdsubject
medicine.medical_specialtymedicine.medical_treatmentBrachytherapyTreatment outcomeBrachytherapyR895-920HDRDose distributionMedical physicistMedical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicinePDRmedicinemedia_common.cataloged_instanceRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingMedical physicsOriginal Research ArticleEuropean unionRC254-282media_commonRadiationCobalt 60 brachytherapybusiness.industryRAKRNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensCertificateSource strengthCalibrationRadiologi och bildbehandlingbusinessRAKR; Calibration; HDR; PDR; BrachytherapyRadiology Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imagingdescription
Background and purpose: Brachytherapy treatment outcomes depend on the accuracy of the delivered dose distribution, which is proportional to the reference air-kerma rate (RAKR). Current societal recommendations require the medical physicist to compare the measured RAKR values to the manufacturer source calibration certificate. The purpose of this work was to report agreement observed in current clinical practice in the European Union. Materials and methods: A European survey was performed for high- and pulsed-dose-rate (HDR and PDR) highenergy sources (Ir-192 and Co-60), to quantify observed RAKR differences. Medical physicists at eighteen hospitals from eight European countries were contacted, providing 1,032 data points from 2001 to 2020. Results: Over the survey period, 77% of the Ir-192 measurements used a well chamber instead of the older Krieger phantom method. Mean differences with the manufacturer calibration certificate were 0.01% +/- 1.15% for Ir-192 and -0.1% +/- 1.3% for Co-60. Over 95% of RAKR measurements in the clinic were within 3% of the manufacturer calibration certificate. Conclusions: This study showed that the agreement level was generally better than that reflected in prior societal recommendations positing 5%. Future recommendations on high-energy HDR and PDR source calibrations in the clinic may consider tightened agreements levels. Funding Agencies|FEDER/MCIyU-AEI; Generalitat ValencianaGeneralitat ValencianaEuropean Commission [PGC2018-101302-B, AICO/2019/132]; Swedish Cancer SocietySwedish Cancer Society [CAN 2017/1029, CAN 2018/622]
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-07-01 |