6533b856fe1ef96bd12b1cfa

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Electromyographic comparison of elastic resistance and machine exercises for high-intensity strength training in patients with chronic stroke

Mikkel BrandtJørgen R. JørgensenPeter ZeemanKenneth JayMarkus D. JakobsenJoaquin CalatayudEmil SundstrupJonas VinstrupLars L. Andersen

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyVastus medialisStrength trainingPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationElectromyographyBiceps03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationmedicineHumansLegmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryElectromyographyRehabilitationStroke RehabilitationResistance Training030229 sport sciencesMiddle Agedmusculoskeletal systemCoactivationConfidence intervalElasticityParesisStrokeHemiparesisTreatment OutcomeAnesthesiaChronic DiseaseFemalemedicine.symptomRange of motionbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

To investigate whether elastic resistance training can induce comparable levels of muscle activity as conventional machine training in patients with chronic stroke.Comparative study.Outpatient rehabilitation facility.Stroke patients (N=18) with hemiparesis (mean age, 57 ± 8y).Patients performed 3 consecutive repetitions at 10 repetition maximum of unilateral knee extension and flexion using elastic resistance and conventional machine training.Surface electromyography was measured in vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus and was normalized to maximal electromyography (% of max) of the nonparetic leg.In the paretic leg, agonist muscle activity ranged from 18% to 24% normalized electromyography (% of max) (nEMG) during knee flexion and from 32% to 40% nEMG during knee extension. For knee extension, vastus lateralis nEMG was higher during machine exercise than during elastic resistance exercise (40% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 33-47] vs 32% [95% CI, 25-39]; P=.003). In the nonparetic leg, agonist muscle activity ranged from 54% to 61% during knee flexion and from 52% to 68% during knee extension. For knee flexion semitendinosus nEMG was higher (61% [95% CI, 50-71] vs 54% [95% CI, 44-64]; P=.016) and for knee extension vastus medialis nEMG was higher (68% [95% CI, 60-76] vs 56% [95% CI, 48-64]; P.001) during machine exercise than during elastic resistance exercise. By contrast, antagonist coactivation was significantly higher during knee flexion when performed using elastic resistance compared with the machine. Lastly, there were no differences in perceived exertion between exercise modalities.Machine training appears to induce slightly higher levels of muscle activity in some of the investigated muscles compared to elastic resistance during lower limb strength training in patients with chronic stroke. The higher level of coactivation during knee flexion when performed using elastic resistance suggests that elastic resistance exercises are more difficult to perform. This is likely due to a higher level of movement instability.

10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.099https://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/c27caeb4-a8b3-4b8d-ab45-65a98b22a15f