6533b858fe1ef96bd12b6cb9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Codevelopment of Group Relationships: The Role of Individual Group Member's and Other Group Members' Mutual Influence and Shared Group Environment

Salvatore GulloGabriele ProfitaChiara PazzagliDennis M. KivlighanGianluca Lo CocoClaudia Mazzeschi

subject

AdultMaleSocial Psychologymedicine.medical_treatmentPsycINFOGroup relationshipSocial Environmentlaw.inventionGroup psychotherapyInterpersonal relationshipRandomized controlled trialGroup (periodic table)lawSurveys and QuestionnairesmedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesInterpersonal RelationsObesitySocial influence05 social sciencesgroup relationshipsSocial environmentGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedAPIMObject AttachmentCodevelopmentGroup therapy050106 general psychology & cognitive sciencesPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologySexual PartnersPsychotherapy Groupgroup therapy group relationships codevelopment obesity APIMFemalePsychologyGroup developmentClinical psychology

description

Although recent research has provided empirical support for the codevelopment of group interaction (defined as development in a common direction of perceptions of group relationships), no studies have yet investigated the "causes" of codevelopment among group members in the long term. The aim of the current study is to examine how the perceptions of an individual group member, and other group members, regarding group relationships influence each other over the course of treatment. We analyzed group data from 168 adult obese patients who participated in (1 of 20) 12-session therapy groups for weight management. Group relationships were measured by the Group Questionnaire (Krogel et al., 2013), which was administered to group members in early, middle and late group sessions. The longitudinal version of the group actor-partner interdependence model was used to analyze the influence among members. Results showed that there is no mutual influence in the codevelopment of both positive bonding and negative relationship. However, positive bonding of other group members in the middle of the group influenced positive bonding of the individual group member in the late group session. Moreover, individual group member negative relationships in early and middle sessions influenced other group member negative relationships in middle and late sessions. Finally, there was evidence of mutual influence in the codevelopment of positive working early in the group. The findings show that the process of influence among members is complex with regard to the specific dimension of the group relationship assessed and the time spent in group treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

10.1037/cou0000349http://hdl.handle.net/10447/389362