6533b858fe1ef96bd12b6d6a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Size Predicts Outcome in Male Patients Treated for Stress Incontinence: Results of a Large Central European Multicenter Cohort Study

Axel HaferkampM. KuroschCarola WotzkaAlice ObajeRoberto OlianasHagen LoertzerAchim RoseAndres J. SchraderEdwin HerrmannFabian QueissertAlexander FriedlJesco PfitzenmaierRicarda M. BauerTanja HueschRoland HombergCarsten Maik NaumannRuth Kirschner-hermannsRudi AbdunnurAlexander KretschmerTorben HoffmannRalf AndingTobias PottekJoanne Nyarangi-dix

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyStress incontinenceUrologySingle or double cuff030232 urology & nephrologylcsh:RC870-923Erosion rateArtificial urinary sphincter03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineMedicineClinical InvestigationRisk factorAMS 800030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicineStress urinary incontinencebusiness.industryArtificial urinary sphincterlcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urologymedicine.diseaseCuff sizeSurgerymedicine.anatomical_structureNeurologyMale patientCuffSphincterOriginal ArticleNeurology (clinical)businessCohort study

description

Purpose The aim was to study the correlation between cuff size and outcome after implantation of an AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter. Methods A total of 473 male patients with an AMS 800 sphincter implanted between 2012 and 2014 were analyzed in a retrospective multicenter cohort study performed as part of the Central European Debates on Male Incontinence (DOMINO) Project. Results Single cuffs were implanted in 54.5% and double cuffs in 45.5% of the patients. The cuffs used had a median circumference of 4.5 cm. Within a median follow of 18 months, urethral erosion occurred in 12.8% of the cases and was associated significantly more often with small cuff sizes (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that, apart from cuff size (P=0.03), prior irradiation (P<0.001) and the penoscrotal approach (P=0.036) were associated with an increased erosion rate. Continence rate tended to be highest with median cuff sizes (4–5.5 cm). Conclusions Apart from irradiation and the penoscrotal approach, small cuff size is a risk factor for urethral erosion. Results are best with cuff sizes of 4.5–5.5 cm.

10.5213/inj.1938032.016http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6790824