6533b85bfe1ef96bd12ba127

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A possible solution of the puzzling variation of the orbital period of MXB 1659-298

F. ScaranoA. RiggioT. Di SalvoAndrea SannaAntonino D'aiLuciano BurderiM. MatrangaR. IariaAngelo Gambino

subject

Star (game theory)FOS: Physical sciencesX-rays: starsAstrophysicsEphemeris01 natural sciencesJovianstars: neutronSettore FIS/05 - Astronomia E Astrofisicastars: individual: MXB 1659-2980103 physical sciencesAstrophysics::Solar and Stellar AstrophysicsBinary system010303 astronomy & astrophysicsEclipsePhysicsHigh Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)010308 nuclear & particles physicsbinaries: eclipsingAstronomyAstronomy and AstrophysicsCoupling (probability)Orbital periodX-rays: binarieNeutron stareclipsing; stars: individual: MXB 1659-298; stars: neutron; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: stars [ephemerides; binaries]Space and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics::Earth and Planetary AstrophysicsephemerideAstrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

description

MXB 1659-298 is a transient neutron star Low-Mass X-ray binary system that shows eclipses with a periodicity of 7.1 hr. The source went to outburst in August 2015 after 14 years of quiescence. We investigate the orbital properties of this source with a baseline of 40 years obtained combining the eight eclipse arrival times present in literature with 51 eclipse arrival times collected during the last two outbursts. A quadratic ephemeris does not fit the delays associated with the eclipse arrival times and the addition of a sinusoidal term with a period of $2.31 \pm 0.02$ yr is required. We infer a binary orbital period of $P=7.1161099(3)$ hr and an orbital period derivative of $\dot{P}=-8.5(1.2) \times 10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$. We show that the large orbital period derivative can be explained with a highly non conservative mass transfer scenario in which more than 98\% of the mass provided by the companion star leaves the binary system. We predict an orbital period derivative value of $\dot{P}=-6(3) \times 10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$ and constrain the companion star mass between $\sim$0.3 and $ 0.9 \pm 0.3$ M$_{\odot}$. Assuming that the companion star is in thermal equilibrium the periodic modulation can be due to either a gravitational quadrupole coupling due to variations of the oblateness of the companion star or with the presence of a third body of mass M$_3 >21 $ Jovian masses.

https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1703.05294