6533b85cfe1ef96bd12bd417

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The duality of ocean acidification as a resource and a stressor

Sean D. ConnellZoë A. DoubledayBrian HelmuthBayden D. RussellGianluca SaràBrendan P. KelaherKirsten L. RodgersIvan NagelkerkenSarah B. HamlynChristopher D. G. HarleyNicole R. Foster

subject

Settore BIO/07 - Ecologia0106 biological sciences010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesKelpClimate change01 natural sciencesphase shiftAnimalsHumansDominance (ecology)SeawaterEcosystemcalcifying herbivores14. Life underwaterEcosystemEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics0105 earth and related environmental sciencesTurf algaebiologyEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologykelp forestStressorOcean acidificationCarbon DioxideHydrogen-Ion Concentration15. Life on landbiology.organism_classificationKelp forestturf algaeclimate changeKelp13. Climate actionEnvironmental scienceCO2calcifying herbivores climate change CO2 kelp forest phase shift turf algae Animals Carbon Dioxide Humans Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Seawater Ecosystem Kelp

description

Ecologically dominant species often define ecosystem states, but as human disturbances intensify, their subordinate counterparts increasingly displace them. We consider the duality of disturbance by examining how environmental drivers can simultaneously act as a stressor to dominant species and as a resource to subordinates. Using a model ecosystem, we demonstrate that CO2-driven interactions between species can account for such reversals in dominance; i.e., the displacement of dominants (kelp forests) by subordinates (turf algae). We established that CO2 enrichment had a direct positive effect on productivity of turfs, but a negligible effect on kelp. CO2 enrichment further suppressed the abundance and feeding rate of the primary grazer of turfs (sea urchins), but had an opposite effect on the minor grazer (gastropods). Thus, boosted production of subordinate producers, exacerbated by a net reduction in its consumption by primary grazers, accounts for community change (i.e., turf displacing kelp). Ecosystem collapse, therefore, is more likely when resource enrichment alters competitive dominance of producers, and consumers fail to compensate. By recognizing such duality in the responses of interacting species to disturbance, which may stabilize or exacerbate change, we can begin to understand how intensifying human disturbances determine whether or not ecosystems undergo phase shifts. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2209