6533b85dfe1ef96bd12bf192

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Understanding sigma-phase precipitation in a stabilized austenitic stainless steel (316Nb) through complementary CALPHAD-based and experimental investigations

Bernard MariniT. GuilbertX. LedouxC. HarderG. TexierCaroline Toffolon-mascletAurélien PerronVincent VignalStéphane UrvoyJ. FarreFrancois BuyS. BosonnetPh. PetitE. SuzonF. Cortial

subject

AusteniteMaterials sciencePolymers and PlasticsPrecipitation (chemistry)MetallurgyMetals and AlloysAnalytical chemistryengineering.materialElectronic Optical and Magnetic MaterialsFerrite (iron)Ceramics and CompositesengineeringThermomechanical processingGrain boundaryAustenitic stainless steelCALPHADEutectic system

description

Abstract Sigma-phase precipitation in a 316Nb “stabilized” austenitic stainless steel was studied through complementary CALPHAD-based and dedicated experimental investigations. Thermokinetic calculations performed using Thermo-Calc (with the DICTRA module) and MatCalc software showed that the sigma phase (σ) precipitated directly at γ-austenite grain boundaries (GB) via a common solid-state reaction when carbon and nitrogen contents fell below a critical threshold. Residual δ ferrite was found to be more susceptible to σ-phase precipitation; this type of precipitation occurred via two mechanisms that depended on the concentration profiles of δ-ferrite stabilizing elements induced by previous thermomechanical processing: direct σ precipitation (δ → σ) along the periphery of δ islands followed by a eutectoid decomposition (δ → σ + γ2) within these islands. Both simulations and experiments revealed that the σ phase at γ GB contained higher amounts of Mo and Ni, while σ within δ ferrite possessed higher contents of Fe and Cr. Finally, the simulated time–temperature–precipitation diagrams for the σ phase in residual δ ferrite were found to be in very good agreement with the experimental ones and comparable to those observed in duplex stainless steels.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.066