6533b85efe1ef96bd12bf458
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Construct Validity and Population-Based Norms of the German Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).
Raffael KalischRolf Van DickOliver QuiringAndreas G. FrankeIsabell HoffmannThomas RigottiAndrea ChmitorzMarkus SchäferKlaus LiebOliver TüscherChristiana BagusatAngela KunzlerAntonia J. Kaluzasubject
050103 clinical psychologyeducation.field_of_studyrepresentative sample05 social sciencesPopulationfungiConstruct validity050109 social psychologyPopulation basedlanguage.human_languageGermanPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical Psychologypredictorsnorm datalanguage0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesResilience scaleOriginal ArticlePsychologyeducationSocial psychologyBRSGerman versiondescription
Abstract. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) measures the ability to recover from stress. To provide further evidence for construct validity of the German BRS and to determine population-based norms, a large sample (N = 1,128) representative of the German adult population completed a survey including the BRS and instruments measuring perceived stress and the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy, and locus of control. Confirmatory factor analyses showed best model fit for a five-factor model differentiating the ability to recover from stress from the three resilience factors. On the basis of latent and manifest correlations, convergent and discriminant validity of the BRS were fair to good. Female sex, older age, lower weekly working time, higher perceived stress, lower optimism, and self-efficacy as well as higher external locus of control predicted lower BRS scores, that is, lower ability to recover from stress.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-01 | European journal of health psychology |