6533b85ffe1ef96bd12c1c3a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with ciclosporin A: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.

Florian StehlingClaudia SchmoorJanbernd KirschnerG. BernertSimone ThieleBernd ReitterJürg LütschgRudolf KorinthenbergGabriele IhorstGert WiegandMaja Von Der HagenEkkehard WilichowskiUlrike ScharaElke HobbiebrunkenGeorg M. StettnerUlrike GriebenSimone WeissJoachim SchesslWolfgang Müller-felber

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyDuchenne muscular dystrophyMedizinPlacebolaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled trialDouble-Blind MethodlawPrednisoneInternal medicinemedicineHumansMuscular dystrophyChild030304 developmental biology0303 health sciencesbusiness.industryMuscle weaknessmedicine.diseaseCiclosporin3. Good healthSurgeryClinical trialMuscular Dystrophy DuchenneReview Literature as TopicTreatment OutcomeCyclosporineNeurology (clinical)medicine.symptombusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgerymedicine.drug

description

Summary Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare X-linked progressive disease characterised by loss of ambulation at about age 10 years, with death in early adulthood due to respiratory and cardiac insufficiency. Steroids are effective at slowing the progression of muscle weakness; however, their use is limited by side-effects, prompting the search for alternatives. We assessed the effect of ciclosporin A as monotherapy and in combination with intermittent prednisone for the treatment of ambulant patients with this disorder. Methods Our study was a parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial at trial sites of the German muscular dystrophy network, MD-NET, over 36 months. Ambulant patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who were aged 5 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either ciclosporin A (3·5–4·0 mg/kg per day) or matching placebo. Allocation was done centrally with computer-generated random numbers. Patients and investigators were masked to the allocated treatment. After 3 months of treatment, both groups were also given intermittent prednisone for a further 12 months (0·75 mg/kg, alternating 10 days on with 10 days off). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome measure was manual muscle strength measured on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. This trial is registered with the German clinical trial register DRKS, number DRKS00000445. Findings 77 patients were randomly assigned to the ciclosporin A group and 76 to the placebo group; 73 patients on ciclosporin A and 73 on placebo received at least one dose and were available for efficacy analyses. 3 months of treatment with ciclosporin A alone did not show any significant improvement in primary outcome measures (mean change in the proportion of a possible total MRC score [%MRC] was −2·6 [SD 6·0] for patients on ciclosporin A and −0·8 [4·9] for patients on placebo; adjusted group difference estimate −0·88, 97·5% CI −2·6 to 0·9; p=0·26). The combination of ciclosporin A with intermittent steroids was not better than intermittent steroids alone over 12 months (mean change in %MRC was 0·7 [7·1] for patients on ciclosporin A and −0·3 [7·9] for patients on placebo; adjusted group difference estimate −0·85, −3·6 to 1·9; p=0·48). Numbers of adverse events (75 in patients on ciclosporin A and 74 on placebo) and serious adverse events (four with ciclosporin A and four with placebo) did not differ significantly between groups. Interpretation Ciclosporin A alone or in combination with intermittent prednisone does not improve muscle strength or functional abilities in ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, but is safe and well tolerated. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Action Benni and co eV, Novartis Pharma AG, and Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Muskelkranke eV.

10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70196-4https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21087735