6533b860fe1ef96bd12c3988
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Cancer Risk Near a Polluted River in Finland
Antti PenttinenPia K. VerkasaloJuha PekkanenEero PukkalaHannu KivirantaEsa KokkiTerttu Vartiainensubject
MaleMini-Monograph: Information SystemsHealth Toxicology and MutagenesisPCDFPCDD010501 environmental sciences01 natural sciences0302 clinical medicinedioxinsNeoplasmsEpidemiologyRegistries030212 general & internal medicineChildFinlandMiddle AgedGISPolychlorinated Biphenyls3. Good healthChild PreschoolepidemiologyFemaleRisk assessmentRecord linkageAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentRisk Assessment03 medical and health sciencesRiversmedicinecancerHumansSocioeconomic statusAgedBenzofurans0105 earth and related environmental sciencesbusiness.industryInfant NewbornPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthInfantCancerDibenzofurans Polychlorinatedmedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalCancer registryEpidemiologic Studies13. Climate actionRelative riskrecord linkagebusinessWater Pollutants ChemicalDemographydescription
The River Kymijoki in southern Finland is heavily polluted with polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans and may pose a health threat to local residents, especially farmers. In this study we investigated cancer risk in people living near the river (less than 20.0 km) in 1980. We used a geographic information system, which stores registry data, in 500 m times 500 m grid squares, from the Population Register Centre, Statistics Finland, and Finnish Cancer Registry. From 1981 to 2000, cancer incidence in all people (N = 188884) and in farmers (n = 11132) residing in the study area was at the level expected based on national rates. Relative risks for total cancer and 27 cancer subtypes were calculated by distance of individuals to the river in 1980 (reference: 5.0-19.9 km, 1.0-4.9 km, less than 1.0 km), adjusting for sex, age, time period, socioeconomic status, and distance of individuals to the sea. The respective relative risks for total cancer were 1.00, 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.13], and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.99-1.09) among all residents, and 1.00, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.85-1.15), and 1.13 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32) among farmers. A statistically significant increase was observed for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (not included in total cancers) in all residents less than 5.0 km. Several other common cancers, including cancers of the breast, uterine cervix, gallbladder, and nervous system, showed slightly elevated risk estimates at less than 5.0 km from the river. Despite the limitations of exposure assessment, we cannot exclude the possibility that residence near the river may have contributed to a small increase in cancer risk, especially among farmers.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-06-01 | Environmental Health Perspectives |