6533b862fe1ef96bd12c628f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Convolution of three functions by means of bilinear maps and applications

José Luis ArreguiOscar Blasco

subject

Discrete mathematicsSymmetric bilinear formSesquilinear formGeneral MathematicsBanach spaceOrthogonal complementBilinear formMultiplier (Fourier analysis)46E40Tensor productInterpolation space46B2846G25Mathematics

description

When dealing with spaces of vector-valued analytic functions there is a natural way to understand multipliers between them. If X and Y are Banach spaces and L(X,Y ) stands for the space of linear and continuous operators we may consider the convolution of L(X,Y )-valued analytic functions, say F (z) = ∑ n=0∞ Tnz , and X-valued polynomials, say f(z) = ∑m n=0 xnz , to get the Y -valued function F ∗ f(z) = ∑ Tn(xn)z. The second author considered such a definition and studied multipliers between H(X) and BMOA(Y ) in [5]. When the functions take values in a Banach algebra A then the natural extension of multiplier is simply that if f(z) = ∑ anz n and g(z) = ∑ bnz , then f ∗ g(z) = ∑ an.bnz n where a.b stands for the product in the algebra A. Of course, similarly one can consider an ∈ L(R), bn ∈ L(R) and the convolution an ∗ bn ∈ L(R) (where p, q, r verifies the condition on Young’s theorem). The reader is referred to [3] for results along these lines. In this paper we shall consider a much more general notion of convolutions coming from general bilinear maps and that will extend the previous examples. Assume X,Y, Z are Banach spaces and let u : X × Y → Z be a bounded bilinear map. Given a X-valued polynomial f(z) = ∑m n=0 xnz n and given a Y -valued polynomial g(z) = ∑k n=0 ynz n we define the u-convolution of f an g as the polynomial given by

https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1255985214