6533b862fe1ef96bd12c7719

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Diagnostic yield of ink-jet prints from digital radiographs for the assessment of approximal carious lesions: ROC-analysis

Matthias WedelRalf SchulzeDirk SchulzeStefanie GrimmKai VossHans-peter Keller

subject

PaperOrthodonticsDental radiographymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryRadiographySignificant differenceReproducibility of ResultsDentistryDiagnostic accuracyRadiography Dental DigitalGeneral MedicineDental CariesCritical ratioROC CurveDiagnostic qualityHumansPrintingMedicineInkRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingCarious lesionComputer PeripheralsbusinessWorking environment

description

Abstract Aims To investigate the diagnostic quality of different quality, individually calibrated ink-jet printers for the very challenging dental radiographic task of approximal carious lesion detection. Materials and methods A test-pattern evaluating resolution, contrast and homogeneity of the ink-jet prints was developed. 50 standardized dental radiographs each showing two neighbouring teeth in natural contact were printed on glossy paper with calibrated, randomly selected ink-jet printers (Canon S520 and iP4500, Epson Stylus Photo R2400). Printing size equalled the viewing size on a 17″ cathode-ray-tube monitor daily quality-tested according to German regulations. The true caries status was determined from serial sectioning and microscopic evaluation. 16 experienced observers evaluated the radiographs on a five-point confidence scale on all prints plus the viewing monitor with respect to the visibility of a carious lesion. A non-parametric Receiver-Operating Characteristics (ROC-) analysis was performed explicitly designed for the evaluation of readings stemming from identical samples but different modality. Significant differences are expressed by a critical ratio z exceeding ±2. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by the area (Az) underneath the ROC-curves. Results Average Az-values ranged between 0.62 (S520 and R2400) and 0.64 (monitor, iP4500), with no significant difference between modalities (P = 0.172). Neither significant (range mean z: −0.40 (S520) and −0.11 (iP4500)) nor clinically relevant differences were found between printers and viewing monitor. Conclusions Our results for a challenging task in dental radiography indicate that calibrated, off-the-shelf ink-jet printers are able to reproduce (dental) radiographs at quality levels sufficient for radiographic diagnosis in a typical dental working environment.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.015