6533b86ffe1ef96bd12ce8ca

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Real-time spatial compound sonography of Achilles tendon in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and normal physical examination

Tommaso Vincenzo BartolottaMalizia GMamone GRoberto LagallaMassimo MidiriGiovanni MaliziaAdele TaibbiCarlo Maria Barbagallo

subject

AdultMaleHeterozygotemedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentPhysical examinationFamilial hypercholesterolemiaAchilles TendonHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIMuscular DiseasesXanthomatosismedicineHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingIn patientChildPhysical ExaminationAgedUltrasonographyNeuroradiologyAchilles tendonmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryUltrasoundInterventional radiologyGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseSurgerySonographymedicine.anatomical_structureFemaleUltrasonographybusiness

description

This study was undertaken to assess the prevalence and ultrasound features of Achilles tendon xanthomas (ATX) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) and normal physical examination studied with high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and, secondarily, to evaluate the role of real-time spatial compound sonography (CS) in terms of image quality.Both Achilles tendons of 40 patients with HFH were studied with HRUS and CS. Two experienced radiologists evaluated by consensus the presence of ATX described as (1) tendon thickening and/or (2) focal hypoechoic areas and the quality of images obtained with the two techniques.Ten out of 80 tendons showed thickening (mean: 11.2 mm). Twelve xanthomas 4.1-9.8 mm were identified in 9/80 tendons of five patients. In 5/80 tendons, both tendon thickening and focal hypoechoic areas were observed. There was no difference in the number of xanthomas detected at conventional US or CS. With respect to image quality, the performance of CS was considered significantly higher than HRUS in 72/80 (90%) cases and equal to HRUS in the remaining 8/80 (10%) (p0.001).CS is an effective tool in the assessment of ATX in patients with HFH and normal physical examination, and provides a better image quality when compared with HRUS.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-007-0162-4