6533b871fe1ef96bd12d1bed

RESEARCH PRODUCT

INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison

Jennifer WinterJennifer WinterKanak MungikarMonika Chanu ChongthamTamer ButtoSusanne Gerber

subject

MaleQH301-705.5Cell type specificATAC-seqATAC-SeqComputational biologyCell SeparationBiologyCatalysisFluorescenceArticleInorganic ChemistryMiceINTACTAnimalsRNA-SeqBiology (General)Physical and Theoretical Chemistryneuronal nucleiQD1-999Molecular BiologySpectroscopyCell specificCell NucleusOrganic ChemistrySortingGeneral MedicineFlow CytometryChromatinComputer Science ApplicationsChromatinChemistryProtein Transportnuclei sortingNeuronal nucleiFemaleFANS

description

Increasing numbers of studies seek to characterize the different cellular sub-populations present in mammalian tissues. The techniques “Isolation of Nuclei Tagged in Specific Cell Types” (INTACT) or “Fluorescence-Activated Nuclei Sorting” (FANS) are frequently used for isolating nuclei of specific cellular subtypes. These nuclei are then used for molecular characterization of the cellular sub-populations. Despite the increasing popularity of both techniques, little is known about their isolation efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages or downstream molecular effects. In our study, we compared the physical and molecular attributes of sfGFP+ nuclei isolated by the two methods—INTACT and FANS—from the neocortices of Arc-CreERT2 × CAG-Sun1/sfGFP animals. We identified differences in efficiency of sfGFP+ nuclei isolation, nuclear size as well as transcriptional (RNA-seq) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) states. Therefore, our study presents a comprehensive comparison between the two widely used nuclei sorting techniques, identifying the advantages and disadvantages for both INTACT and FANS. Our conclusions are summarized in a table to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable methodology for their individual experimental design.

10.3390/ijms22105335http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105335