6533b872fe1ef96bd12d37cd

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Thermal neutron capture cross section of the radioactive isotopeFe60

Rugard DresslerG. HampelChristian StieghorstZ. SlavkovskáRalf PlagMax BichlerRene ReifarthJan GloriusAnne EndresStefan SchmidtNorbert WiehlKathrin GöbelAnton WallnerKerstin SonnabendMario WeigandM. HeftrichKlaus EberhardtF. KäppelerDorothea SchumannTanja HeftrichC. LedererStephan ZaunerM. Mikorski

subject

PhysicsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsThermal neutron captureResonance7. Clean energyGalaxyNuclear physicsNeutron captureCross section (physics)13. Climate actionNucleosynthesisAtomic physicss-processEnergy (signal processing)

description

Background: Fifty percent of the heavy element abundances are produced via slow neutron capture reactions in different stellar scenarios. The underlying nucleosynthesis models need the input of neutron capture cross sections.Purpose: One of the fundamental signatures for active nucleosynthesis in our galaxy is the observation of long-lived radioactive isotopes, such as $^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$ with a half-life of $2.60\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{6}$ yr. To reproduce this $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ activity in the universe, the nucleosynthesis of $^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$ has to be understood reliably.Methods: An $^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$ sample produced at the Paul Scherrer Institut (Villigen, Switzerland) was activated with thermal and epithermal neutrons at the research reactor at the Johannes Gutenberg-Universit\"at Mainz (Mainz, Germany).Results: The thermal neutron capture cross section has been measured for the first time to ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\text{th}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}0.226\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{(}_{\ensuremath{-}0.049}^{+0.044})\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\text{b}$. An upper limit of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\text{RI}}l0.50\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\text{b}$ could be determined for the resonance integral.Conclusions: An extrapolation towards the astrophysically interesting energy regime between $kT=10$ and 100 keV illustrates that the $s$-wave part of the direct capture component can be neglected.

https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.92.015806