6533b873fe1ef96bd12d44de

RESEARCH PRODUCT

SARS-CoV-2 vs. Hepatitis Virus Infection Risk in the Hemodialysis Population: What Should We Expect?

Elena Gimenez-civeraMaría Jesús PuchadesPablo MolinaLorena GandíaSergio Romero-alcaideMiguel A. SerraJavier RequeNayara PanizoJosé Luis GórrizLuis D'marco

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyCOVID19Health Toxicology and Mutagenesismedicine.medical_treatmentPopulation030232 urology & nephrologymedicine.disease_cause03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRenal DialysisSeroepidemiologic StudiesPandemicHepatitis VirusesmedicineSeroprevalenceHumanshepatitisIntensive care medicineeducationCoronavirusHepatitiseducation.field_of_studybusiness.industryTransmission (medicine)SARS-CoV-2RPublic Health Environmental and Occupational Healthvirus diseasesCOVID-19medicine.diseaseVaccinationEditorialMedicinedialysis030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyHemodialysisbusinesschronic kidney disease

description

Since the dramatic rise of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients receiving dialysis have emerged as especially susceptible to this infection because of their impaired immunologic state, chronic inflammation and the high incidence of comorbidities. Although several strategies have thus been implemented to minimize the risk of transmission and acquisition in this population worldwide, the reported severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence varies across studies but is higher than in the general population. On the contrary, the screening for hepatitis viruses (HBV and HCV) has seen significant improvements in recent years, with vaccination in the case of HBV and effective viral infection treatment for HCV. In this sense, a universal SARS-CoV-2 screening and contact precaution appear to be effective in preventing further transmission. Finally, regarding the progress, an international consensus with updated protocols that prioritize between old and new indicators would seem a reasonable tool to address these unexpended changes for the nephrology community.

10.3390/ijerph18115748http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8198690