Search results for "jel:C92"

showing 3 items of 3 documents

How Do Judgmental Overconfidence and Overoptimism Shape Innovative Activity?

2021

Recent field evidence suggests a positive link between overconfidence and innovative activities. In this paper we argue that the connection between overconfidence and innovation is more complex than the previous literature suggests. In particular, we show theoretically and experimentally that different forms of overconfidence may have opposing effects on innovative activity. While overoptimism is positively associated with innovation, judgmental overconfidence is negatively linked to innovation. Our results indicate that future research is well advised to take into account that the relationship between innovation and overconfidence may crucially depend on what type of overconfidence is most…

UnternehmerEconomics and EconometricsVertrauenInnovation entrepreneurship overconfi dence experimentTestOverconfidencejel:D83Context (language use)jel:D232002 Economics and EconometricsSelbstevaluationentrepreneurshipExperimentECON Department of Economics10007 Department of EconomicsEconomicsddc:330C92OptimismusPositive economicsoverconfidenceInnovationjel:C92experimentEntrepreneurship330 Economicsinnovation entrepreneurship overconfidence experimentD832003 FinancePersönlichkeitspsychologieD23FinanceOverconfidence effectSSRN Electronic Journal
researchProduct

An experimental analysis of team production in networks

2010

Experimental and empirical evidence highlights the role of networks on social outcomes. In this paper we test the properties of exogenously fixed networks in team production. Subjects make the same decisions in a team-work environment under four different organizational networks: The line, the circle, the star, and the complete network. In all the networks, links make information available to neighbors. This design allows us to analyze decisions across networks and a variety of subjects’ types in a standard linear team production game. Contribution levels differ significantly across networks and the star is the most efficient incomplete one. Moreover, our results suggest that subjects act a…

jel:C92jel:H41public goods networks experiments
researchProduct

Reciprocity, matching and conditional cooperation in two public goods games

2005

Previous experimental and empirical evidence has identified social preferences in the voluntary provision of public goods. A number of competing models of such preferences have been proposed. We provide evidence for one model of behavior in these games, reciprocity (or matching, or conditional cooperation). Consistent with previous research, we find that participants in the voluntary contribution mechanism attempt to match the contributions of others in their group. We also examine participants in a related game with different equilibria, the weakest-link mechanism. Here, in contrast, participants contribute so as to match the minimum contribution of others in their group.

jel:C92Economics and EconometricsMatching (statistics)jel:C72jel:D44Contrast (statistics)jel:H41Strong reciprocityExperimental economicsPublic goodExperimental economics public goods voluntary contribution mechanism weakest link mechanism reciprocitySocial preferencesMicroeconomicsReciprocity (social psychology)EconomicsEmpirical evidenceFinanceEconomics Letters
researchProduct