6533b828fe1ef96bd1289091

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cost effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post- hoc analysis of the smile-4 study

Dario ZavaSalvatore NovoClaudio BorghiArrigo Fg CiceroStefano OmboniGiorgio ReggiardoDragos VinereanuD Degli EspostiGiuseppe AmbrosioEttore AmbrosioniStefano Bacchelli

subject

left ventricular dysfunctionmedicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industryCost effectivenessHealth PolicyPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthElectrocardiography in myocardial infarctionacute myocardial infarctioncost-effectiveneramiprilacetylsalicylic acidmedicine.diseaseSettore MED/11 - Malattie Dell'Apparato CardiovascolareZofenoprilchemistry.chemical_compoundangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorchemistryInternal medicinePost-hoc analysismedicineCardiologyIn patientzofenoprilMyocardial infarctionbusiness

description

BACKGROUND: In SMILE-4 (the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation 4 study), zofenopril + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was superior to ramipril + ASA in reducing the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute myocardial infarction. The present post hoc analysis was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of zofenopril and ramipril. METHODS: In total, 771 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and acute myocardial infarction were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive zofenopril 60 mg/day (n = 389) or ramipril 10 mg/day (n = 382) + ASA 100 mg/day and were followed up for one year. The primary study endpoint was the one-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. The economic analysis was based on evaluation of cost of medications and hospitalizations and was applied to the intention-to-treat population (n = 716). Cost data were drawn from the National Health Service databases of the European countries participating in the study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used to quantify the cost per event prevented with zofenopril versus ramipril. RESULTS: Zofenopril significantly (P = 0.028) reduced the risk of the primary study endpoint by 30% as compared with ramipril (95% confidence interval, 4%-49%). The number needed to treat to prevent a major cardiovascular event with zofenopril was 13 less than with ramipril. The cost of drug therapies was higher with zofenopril (328.78 Euros per patient per year, n = 365) than with ramipril (165.12 Euros per patient per year, n = 351). The cost related to the occurrence of major cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization averaged 4983.64 Euros for zofenopril and 4850.01 Euros for ramipril. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for zofenopril versus ramipril was 2125.45 Euros per event prevented (worst and best case scenario in the sensitivity analysis was 3590.09 and 3243.96 Euros, respectively). CONCLUSION: Zofenopril is a viable and cost-effective treatment for managing patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1487http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1487