6533b831fe1ef96bd129873e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Defining user experience goals to guide the design of industrial systems

Virpi RotoHannu KarvonenTuuli KeskinenYichen LuPertti SaariluomaJaakko HakulinenEija KaasinenTomi HeimonenJussi P. P. JokinenHelena TokkonenHanna KoskinenMarkku Turunen

subject

Sociology of scientific knowledgeEngineeringKnowledge managementEmerging technologiesmedia_common.quotation_subjectindustrial systemsecperience-driven designEmpathyArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)User experience designMultidisciplinary approachuser experienceDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyGoal settingmedia_commonta113business.industryGeneral Social Sciencesta6132user ecperience goalViewpointsHuman-Computer InteractionStrategic designexperience-driven designuser experience goalbusiness

description

The key prerequisite for experience-driven design is to define what experience to design for. User experience (UX) goals concretise the intended experience. Based on our own case studies from industrial environments and a literature study, we propose five different approaches to acquiring insight and inspiration for UX goal setting: Brand, Theory, Empathy, Technology, and Vision. Each approach brings in a different viewpoint, thus supporting the multidisciplinary character of UX. The Brand approach ensures that the UX goals are in line with the company's brand promise. The Theory approach utilises the available scientific knowledge of human behaviour. The Empathy approach focuses on knowing the actual users and stepping into their shoes. The Technology approach considers the new technologies that are being introduced and their positive or negative influence on UX. Finally, the Vision approach focuses on renewal, introducing new kinds of UXs. In the design of industrial systems, several stakeholders are involved and they should share common design goals. Using the different UX goal-setting approaches together brings in the viewpoints of different stakeholders, thus committing them to UX goal setting and emphasising UX as a strategic design decision.

10.1080/0144929x.2015.1035335https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1035335