6533b835fe1ef96bd129ed22
RESEARCH PRODUCT
ICD Implantation in infants and small children: the extracardiac technique.
Wolfgang RuschewskiChristoph KampmannJohannes KrollMaria Gonzalez Y GonzalezThomas KriebelHeike SchneiderKatharina WalterF.a.c.c. Thomas Paul M.d.M. Heinemannsubject
Malemedicine.medical_specialtyDefibrillationmedicine.medical_treatmentAnterior wallElectric Countershock030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyProsthesis Implantation03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineLead (electronics)Childbusiness.industrySmall childrenInfantArrhythmias CardiacGeneral MedicineImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator3. Good healthIcd implantationSurgeryDefibrillators Implantablemedicine.anatomical_structureTreatment OutcomeVentricleChild PreschoolFemaleCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessVertebral columndescription
There is no clear methodology for implantation of an internal cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in infants and small children. The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of an extracardiac ICD implantation technique in pediatric patients.An extracardiac ICD system was implanted in eight patients (age: 0.3-8 years; body weight: 4-29 kg). Under fluoroscopic guidance a defibrillator lead was tunneled subcutaneously starting from the anterior axillar line along the course of the 6th rib until almost reaching the vertebral column. After a partial inferior sternotomy, bipolar steroid-eluting sensing and pacing leads were sutured to the atrial wall (n = 2) and to the anterior wall of the right ventricle (n = 8). The ICD device was implanted as "active can" in the upper abdomen. Sensing, pacing, and defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) as well as impedances were verified intraoperatively and 3 months later, respectively.In seven of eight patients, intraoperative DFT between subcutaneous lead and device was15 J. In the eighth patient ICD implantation was technically not feasible due to a DFT20 J. During follow-up (mean 14.5 months) appropriate and effective ICD discharges were noted in two patients. DFT remained stable after 3 months in four of six patients retested. A revision was required in one patient due to lead migration and in another patient due to a lead break.In infants and small children, extracardiac ICD implantation was technically feasible. Experience and follow-up are still limited. The course of the DFT is unknown, facing further growth of the patients.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007-01-05 | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE |