6533b852fe1ef96bd12aaadc
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus the Combination of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and an Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
B. WolckeDorothee M. AeppliMark F. SchoefmannHeinke TeichmannWolfgang DickD. MauerKarl H. LindnerKeith G. LurieTerry A Provosubject
medicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industrymedicine.medical_treatmenteducationImpedance threshold deviceReturn of spontaneous circulationmedicine.diseaseAdvanced life supportSurgeryPhysiology (medical)AnesthesiaVentricular fibrillationmedicineIntubationCardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineProspective cohort studybusinessSurvival ratehealth care economics and organizationspsychological phenomena and processesdescription
Background— Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR combined with an inspiratory impedance threshold device (ITD) improves vital organ blood flow during cardiac arrest. This study compared survival rates with ACD+ITD CPR versus standard manual CPR (S-CPR). Methods and Results— A prospective, controlled trial was performed in Mainz, Germany, in which a 2-tiered emergency response included early defibrillation. Patients with out-of-hospital arrest of presumed cardiac pathogenesis were sequentially randomized to ACD+ITD CPR or S-CPR by the advanced life support team after intubation. Rescuers learned which method of CPR to use at the start of each work shift. The primary end point was 1-hour survival after a witnessed arrest. With ACD+ITD CPR (n=103), return of spontaneous circulation and 1- and 24-hour survival rates were 55%, 51%, and 37% versus 37%, 32%, and 22% with S-CPR (n=107) ( P =0.016, 0.006, and 0.033, respectively). One- and 24-hour survival rates in witnessed arrests were 55% and 41% with ACD+ITD CPR versus 33% and 23% in control subjects ( P =0.011 and 0.019), respectively. One- and 24-hour survival rates in patients with a witnessed arrest in ventricular fibrillation were 68% and 58% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 27% and 23% after S-CPR ( P =0.002 and 0.009), respectively. Patients randomized ≥10 minutes after the call for help to the ACD+ITD CPR had a 3 times higher 1-hour survival rate than control subjects ( P =0.002). Hospital discharge rates were 18% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 13% in control subjects ( P =0.41). In witnessed arrests, overall neurological function trended higher with ACD+ITD CPR versus control subjects ( P =0.07). Conclusions— Compared with S-CPR, ACD+ITD CPR significantly improved short-term survival rates for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential long-term benefits of ACD+ITD CPR.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2003-11-04 | Circulation |