6533b853fe1ef96bd12ac9b3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cl−uptake promoting depolarizing GABA actions in immature rat neocortical neurones is mediated by NKCC1

Akihito OkabeWerner KilbHiroki ToyodaAtsuo FukudaAtsuo FukudaHeiko J. LuhmannJunko Yamada

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyNeocortexPhysiologyGABAA receptorDepolarizationBiologygamma-Aminobutyric acidEndocrinologymedicine.anatomical_structureGiant depolarizing potentialsInternal medicinemedicinePatch clampCotransporterReversal potentialmedicine.drug

description

GABA is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mature brain, but during early postnatal development the elevated [Cl−]i in immature neocortical neurones causes GABAA receptor activation to be depolarizing. The molecular mechanisms underlying this intracellular Cl− accumulation remain controversial. Therefore, the GABA reversal potential (EGABA) or [Cl−]i in early postnatal rat neocortical neurones was measured by the gramicidin-perforated patch-clamp method, and the relative expression levels of the cation−Cl− cotransporter mRNAs (in the same cells) were examined by semiquantitative single-cell multiplex RT-PCR to look for statistical correlations with [Cl−]i. The mRNA expression levels were positively (the Cl− accumulating Na+,K+−2Cl− cotransporter NKCC1) or negatively (the Cl− extruding K+−Cl− cotransporter KCC2) correlated with [Cl−]i. NKCC1 mRNA expression was high in early postnatal days, but decreased during postnatal development, whereas KCC2 mRNA expression displayed the opposite pattern. [Cl−]i and NKCC1 mRNA expression were each higher in cortical plate (CP) neurones than in the presumably older layer V/VI pyramidal neurones in a given slice. The pharmacological effects of bumetanide on EGABA were consistent with the different expression levels of NKCC1 mRNA. These data suggest that NKCC1 may play a pivotal role in the generation of GABA-mediated depolarization in immature CP cells, while KCC2 promotes the later maturation of GABAergic inhibition in the rat neocortex.

https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062471