6533b85cfe1ef96bd12bc8cc

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Diagnostic Performance and Radiation Dose of the EOS System to Image Enchondromatosis: A Phantom Study

Luca Maria SconfienzaCarmelo MessinaAlberto BrunoA. LoriaAntonella Del VecchioDomenico AlbanoCristiana Fanciullo

subject

Materials scienceComputed tomographylcsh:TechnologyImaging phantom030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingenchondromalcsh:Chemistry03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineEnchondromatosismedicineGeneral Materials Sciencelcsh:QH301-705.5InstrumentationFluid Flow and Transfer ProcessesReproducibilitymedicine.diagnostic_testlcsh:Tbusiness.industryEOSProcess Chemistry and TechnologyRadiation doseGeneral Engineeringcomputed tomographyRepeatabilityphantommedicine.diseaseconventional radiographylcsh:QC1-999Computer Science ApplicationsConventional radiographylcsh:Biology (General)lcsh:QD1-999lcsh:TA1-2040Anthropomorphic phantomlcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)Nuclear medicinebusinessradiation doselcsh:Physics030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Background: Radiation doses and capability of EOS, conventional radiography (CR), and computed tomography (CT) to detect and measure enchondromas in a dedicated five-year-old anthropomorphic phantom were compared. Methods: To simulate enchondromas, minced pieces of chicken bone and cartilage were packed in conventional kitchen plastic foil to create ovoidal/rounded masses and randomly hung on the phantom. The phantom was imaged five times with CR, CT, and EOS, each time changing the number and position of inserts. All images were reviewed by a senior radiologist and a radiology resident. Results: EOS and CR detected all inserts in 4/5 cases (80%), while in one case 1/17 inserts was not seen. Excellent agreement of EOS with CR (88% reproducibility

10.3390/app10248941http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10248941