6533b872fe1ef96bd12d42de

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Hyperopic Pseudophakic Patients Implanted with the Acri.LISA 366D Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Begoña BaamondeLuis Fernández-vegaJosé F. AlfonsoRobert Montés-micóDavid Madrid-costaDavid Madrid-costaJavier Lozano

subject

MaleRefractive errormedicine.medical_specialtyVisual acuityPseudophakiagenetic structuresMesopic visionmedicine.medical_treatmentAcrylic ResinsVisual AcuityIntraocular lensContrast SensitivityVision disorderTonometry OcularLens Implantation IntraocularOphthalmologymedicineHumansProspective StudiesIntraocular PressureDioptreLenses IntraocularVision BinocularPhacoemulsificationbusiness.industryHipermetropíaPresbyopiaMiddle AgedMultifocal intraocular lensmedicine.diseaseeye diseasesOphthalmoscopyOphthalmologyHyperopiaTreatment OutcomeOftalmologíaOptometryFemalesense organsmedicine.symptombusinessPhotopic vision

description

Our purpose was to assess the visual quality after bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D intraocular lens (IOL; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in patients with hyperopia. We did a prospective and nonrandomized study. One hundred and seventy eyes of 85 patients had bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D IOL. The patients were divided into 2 groups: low to moderate hyperopia (IOL power, 21 to 24.5 diopters [D]) and high hyperopia (IOL power, 25 to 36 D). Monocular and binocular best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), best distance-corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), binocular best distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (VA), and distance contrast sensitivity (CSF) under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (5 cd/m2) conditions were determined. At the 6-month postoperative visit, there were no statistically significant differences in monocular and binocular BSCVA (P = .06 and P = .09, respectively). Monocular and binocular BCNVA were comparable between both groups (P = .24 and P = .42, respectively). The mean binocular best distance-corrected intermediate VA changed significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P < .01) in both groups, and there were no statistically significant differences between groups at any distance. Differences were not found between groups in binocular CSF under mesopic and photopic conditions.In conclusion, bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D in patients with high hyperopia provided a satisfactory full-range of vision comparable with that obtained in patients with low to moderate hyperopia. Sin financiación 3.833 JCR (2009) Q1, 5/49 Ophtalmology UEM

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.036